Search results

Ah, that's what it's called haha. Couldn't have said it better myself.

http://kgov.com/bel/20180730 http://kgov.com/bel/20180731 Dave, there's a difference between debating theology and defending mental illness. Open theism is theology. Flat earthism is mental illness.

You need to put your glasses on and reread the passage again. Or just look at the pictures below. The firmament is not called the seas. The waters gathered into one (echad, meaning a unity of multiple) place(s) are called "Seas." There was no world-wide ocean like we have today. The firmament...

AMEN! I disagree. The earth is slightly off-center in the universe. If it was dead center, the universe would appear to be "center-less", or without a center. kgov.com/axis Correction. They are set in "the firmament of the heavens." There IS a difference. It not only has to fit Genesis...

No, Dave, because if you can't answer a single question, then there's no reason for me to even make my point. DAVE: IS IT EVEN POSSIBLE IN YOUR MIND FOR GOD TO HAVE CREATED A GLOBE EARTH, IN 6 DAYS, ~7000 YEARS AGO? Answer this question, then I will make my point.

Still not addressing my question, and now it seems you're squirming trying to deflect from what I'm asking. Dave: Is it even a possibility in your mind that God created in 6 days a globe orbiting a star in an entire universe of stars, galaxies, nebulae, etc? Put my question in your own words...

Congrats, you can quote scripture. Now answer my question. Which has nothing to do with my question now, does it? Dave: Is it even a possibility in your mind that God created in 6 days a globe orbiting a star in an entire universe of stars, galaxies, nebulae, etc?

Is it even a possibility in your mind that God created in 6 days a globe orbiting a star in an entire universe of stars, galaxies, nebulae, etc? Because You keep confusing the idea that the earth is a globe with "cosmological evolution." THEY'RE NOT THE SAME THING! Please stop conflating them.

Is it missing the point if your point inherently rejects reality, and the response is a correction of that?

Reality isn't "decided on", Dave. Reality is part of God's nature. If you can't adhere to it, then what good are you?

"Stupid doesn't make you sin. Sin makes you stupid."

I already emailed Bob and Doug, nominating Dave for it! Haha

https://v.redd.it/45nl59oyg3d1 Sorry for the vreddit link for those of you on mobile, but that's straight from the post on reddit.

NO ONE SAID YOU HAD TO EXPLAIN WHAT THEY DO. We KNOW what pendulums do, Daft Dave. Take a pendulum of any kind and observe what happens when you yourself pull it to one side and let go. But you DO have to explain the "WHY," if you reject the established "why." That's how science works, Dave...

They look bored, not ashamed.

Dave, it is an established fact that a pendulum's swing path will rotate after the pendulum is set in motion. You reject that the earth is moving, which is the established reason that the path rotates. You assert that the earth's rotation is not the reason, therefore the onus is on you to...

Then you need to explain why the swing path of a pendulum rotates while it swings, and in opposite directions on the opposite halves of the world.

No, but it IS proof that the earth does rotate.. How fast is a separate matter.

No. We get it from a French physicist, perhaps you've heard of him: Leon Foucault. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum

STP, Question for you: How many angels (including fallen, aka demons) do you think exist?