Search results

"Proof by repeated assertion" fallacy. There is noticable difference in the speed of objects in the sky, Dave. Do what Clete said, and you'll see it for yourself.

Plus 20k more in the original thread. No idea how many others on other threads.

You're right. We're sick of you avoiding the arguments we make, only to post more videos about unrelated topics to the current discussion. Saying it doesn't make it so. Not sure where you got that idea, but it was Eratosthenes who measured the circumference of the earth... You can't measure...

Stupid doesn't make you sin. Sin makes you stupid.

They're not moving at the same velocity, Dave.

It's very possible Dave. Once again, you show that you are incapable of understanding just HOW BIG the universe is. You constantly fail to comprehend the scale of the distances.

Curved horizon, non-fish-eye lens. Credit: NASA

What irks me is that the entire time we've used 3000 miles for the flat earth model, NOT ONCE have you said that it was incorrect or unreliable. Why now? Why all of a sudden do you imply that "3000 miles" is not the typical number used for the flat earth model...

Then how far away is it, Dave? That's something YOU need to provide. How far away, how big, and many other questions which YOU REFUSE TO ANSWER! Clete just showed you ABSOLUTE PROOF that the earth couldn't be flat, and you COMPLETELY IGNORED IT!!!

A photo from NASA's "image of the day". Soaring into Sunrise https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/iotd.html

https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheologyonline%2Ecom%2Fshowthread%2Ephp%3Ft%3D130373&share_tid=130373&share_fid=4230&share_type=t

Of course he is. :)

Dave has started ignoring arguments outright, especially if "they're too long"...

Specs? OS? Here's where to talk shop about computers!

What are some of your favorite YouTube videos? Post them here! (Clean videos only please! If you have to question whether it's clean, it's probably not.)

In addition to all of that, I specifically asked Dave to provide a flood model that works with the flat earth model. He has not done so. DFT_Dave, I ask again. Could you outline, even just in general terms, how the flood occurred if the earth was flat. @ everyone reading this thread...

When you ignore arguments such as this one: you have lost the debate. I'm not trying to toot my own horn, nor am I saying that my arguments can't be shown to be wrong. I'm just saying that my argument is a clear rebuttal to Dave's, and the fact that he's ignoring it because "it's too long"...

` Of course it needs to be addressed Dave, because it goes against your position. I thought you were trying to examine both sides of this discussion. This post is proof that you're not.

So now you're ignoring arguments? Yeah, that REALLY doesn't bode well for your side.

The fact that you deleted most of my post does not bode well for you, Dave. Are you unable to come up with a response, Dave? or are you just unwilling? If you could, I would like you to at least try to respond to the rest of that post, and try to show how it is wrong. That is, after all, how...