Search results

The discussion was on whether the earth is FLAT, not if it's round. Clete proved that the earth was NOT FLAT.

Dime a dozen, it seems.

You would have a point, if it weren't for the fact, yes, FACT, that Clete HAS proven his position to be true. The threads are still there for everyone to read. That you won't shows you're not willing concede that Clete can and has backed up his claim that his position is true, and that the flat...

Because it's unnecessary. Perhaps you weren't aware of this, but this thread is PART 2 of the discussion. The original thread has over 5,000 posts. The difference is... Clete has every right to be angry, and has, in fact, proved the flat earth position to be wrong. You want to know what it...

If you are not in this thread to discuss the topic of the thread, please do not post here. This thread is about the flat earth position, et al. If you continue to try to derail the thread, I will remove you from it.

This just came across my Reddit feed. Should help anyone to visualize the area on the earth illuminated by the sun as the year progresses... https://v.redd.it/krzmtoosdmr21 (Find it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/bbyp3t/angle_of_sun_and_daylight_as_year_progresses/)

Do you even know what the Pythagorean theorem is? It has nothing to do with the sky. Mathematics, for the most part, IS etched in stone. We use math to calculate how far away objects here on earth, and we do the exact same thing for things in space. The burden of proof is on YOU to show that...

We do know, because of the Pythagorean theorem. As Clete said earlier, if you want to prove that the objects in the night sky are not as far away as are claimed to be, then you need to refute/disprove large portions of the foundations of mathematics. But you won't, because you can't, because...

Doesn't work if the stars are light-years to billions of light-years away. And we know that space is big enough for that to be true. The furthest stars would be moving at millions of times the speed of light if that were so to be able to get same amount of movement across the sky, and that's...

First deal with the Flood videos and sites your were provided with.

Which just brings the question back to "why would they lie to their families?" Don't respond to that, I'm not interested in discussing that ridiculous conspiracy. I'm more interested in your progress in the topic from earlier. Dave, have you made any progress? Let me know where you're at.

I imagine it'll go something like this... https://youtu.be/vUE4VGWAap4

Start here.

I recommend you check out a couple different sites then, if you're interested. http://kgov.com/hpt http://kgov.com/360 http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html Or, if you prefer watching videos... https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpl6E8stJTiIi8wdLgYj1eXpp-4o1UUkZ...

The Flood of Noah. And it's tilted a lot more than it was originally, and WAY more than you'd think. The Flood of Noah. Earth used to have a 360 day year. The Flood changed that. I tried that (the Flood route) with you once. We didn't get very far. Would you like to try again?

A general comment is not a summary. Post a summary of the video, Dave, or I'm going to remove it as spam.

You've been told before, Dave, post a summary of the video in your own words, or don't share the link to the video.

Uh-uh, Dave. The onus is on YOU to show that it is irrational. You're asserting something contrary to what has been established, therefore the burden of proof is on YOU to show your work.

You have yet to show that the explanation defies rationality. I say this because it has already been rationally explained to you, but you have rejected it out of hand. Saying it doesn't make it so, Dave. You've been shown how it works, logically and rationally, but you continue to assert...