Search results

Here's one:

James 2:24 does not "work in tandem" with Romans 4:5

Which is exactly what John Piper said. Faith in and of itself has no merit. It is not meritorious. Yet it is STILL REQUIRED BY GOD of a person in order for Him to grace that person out.

Because you say so? So women should be sluts and men should be be promiscuous? Isn't that what we have already, and yet the birth rate is declining, most marriages end in divorce, and all for the sake of "progress"? Which is what happens when people become sex addicts prior to marriage...

Then you should have just asked for clarification. Not made a statement of incredulity. It's "Right Divider," not "Diviner." And if that were true, then you should have @mentioned him. When you learn how to ask politely. :yawn:

What would be even more preferable is if people didn't have sex outside of marriage. Then contraceptives wouldn't be needed except for married couples who don't want to have kids, but still want to have sex (as weird as that would be) There should be no such thing as an "unwanted child." Do...

"I do not see how...." makes whatever you say next an appeal to incredulity BY DEFINITION. You were claiming, by your appeal to incredulity, that a Christian Theonomy would be the same as or worse than Sharia Law. Your claim, aside from being fallacious, is wrong. You quoted me, not RD, in...

If you haven't already, I highly recommend listening to Bob's Bible study on Song of Solomon. He did a masterful job of making it extremely clear as to what was being said.

Just so you know, "appeal to common sense" is a fallacy, because A) common sense isn't common and B) what may be common sense may not be correct.

I think Nero COULD have been THE Antichrist, had God decided to come back before 70 A.D. But since He didn't, he wasn't.

An appeal to incredulity is a logical fallacy. Do you think that only secular people should have a say in how their government acts? If not, then "separation of church and state" is just words. If so, however, then your government is guaranteed to break down much quicker.

https://www.versebyverseministry.org/bible-answers/why-is-the-tribe-of-dan-missing-in-revelation-7

Man goes to hell for the sins that their Creator predestined them to do, according to your position. That puts GOD at fault for their going to hell. And he condemns men in injustice, according to your position.

Yet you put the blame squarely on Him, by saying that He chooses some to be saved but not others. Again: What better excuse can you give an unbeliever for his refusal to believe than "My Creator never chose me to be saved"? This is talking about the right to do what one wants with his own...

Also: It's "Sars-CoV-2".

Because we should totally believe everything China says...

No, it's not. And your "explanations" contradict plain scripture, which NEVER puts belief after salvation.

Actually, there is. Deadly negligence is a crime. “When you build a new house, then you shall make a parapet for your roof, that you may not bring guilt of bloodshed on your household if anyone falls from it. - Deuteronomy 22:8...

Yes, people like you. ... mock people like you. Why do you assume that Satan was flung to earth? Sounds like a serious case of begging the question to me. Which supports MY view. Not yours. Sounds like Genesis 3:19... Yeah, you're truly hilarious. So is what you believe. I think...

This is putting the cart before the horse. Scripture says the reverse of what you say.