Search results

Using this kind of reasoning, New Amsterdam isn't actually New York, despite New York's official founding date being that of New Amsterdam's, which eventually became New York. Do you see the problem yet?

This is an appeal to popularity. Just because something is popular doesn't make it right/correct. Hence it being a fallacy.

Sure! https://store.kgov.com/ecclesiastes-and-song-of-songs-mp3-cd-or-mp3-download/

That was directed at Israel, which had a corporate relationship with Christ. But for discussion, sure. It's kind of hard to have a discussion with only one person... ... But I'm sure you knew all that already :)

Is not about the Body of Christ, and thus, everything after this is moot.

This is called begging the question. It's a logical fallacy for a reason. The only time the word "remission" is used in scripture, it's used in the Gospels (in which Jesus says He is come only for the lost sheep of the House of Israel), twice by Peter both times in Acts, and the author of...

Saying it doesn't make it so, Hoping! Make the argument!

Again, "hope" today means something slightly different than "hope" in Paul's time. You're stuck on today's meaning. This is called a Historian's Fallacy. You seem to have ignored literally everything I said about this. From a user named "Hoping," that's rather ironic... Just saying.

14 years. Not 17. Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and also took Titus with me. - Galatians 2:1 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians2:1&version=NKJV

False, if one is in the Body of Christ. People can be called by what they do. People who lie, liars; people who steal, theives; people who murder, murderers; etc. People who sin: Sinners. People who are saved: Christians. If we're dead to the law, the law has no hold on us. We're like the...

I believe I can answer this: The word Paul used for "hope" here is a bit different in meaning than the "hope" we use today. By that I mean that while it's translated as "hope" correctly, it has a different definition than the kind of hope we have and use today. We use the word "hope" to...

Right back atcha!

No, it doesn't.

Saying it doesn't make it so. We've been over this before, B57. It ended with you ignoring what I was saying.

Which is why faith isn't a work. It's not "done to get God to save you." Faith is simply recognizing that you CANNOT do anything, and putting your trust in the one who CAN save you.

No, "grace" is the gift of God. Grace is what is being talked about. "For by grace are you saved... It is the gift of God" The "through faith" is just a prepositional phrase modifying "grace." Grace, not works.

Here's how I see it. It's one thing to have people who agree with you say things that agree with you. It's a whole new ballgame when it's your opponents who disagree with you say things that agree with you. Yeah, that would be nice.

Non sequitur. It does not logically/necessarily follow that because Christ's death is universal, therefore it must be universally effectual.

Children watch EVERYTHING that those around them do. If you've ever been around kids, you know this to be true. Their eyes are always watching what you do.

Isn't God creative in designing not only flowers, but in designing a system that cannot arise via naturalistic means that can produce, consistently, these forms?