Search results

What's nice about the HPT is that you don't have to pick science over scripture, or scripture over science. You CAN pick both, because the HPT is consistent with the Bible: http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ218.html Sorry, but we do not allow blogs to be linked to on our forum...

There is never a reason to stop and intentionally kill an innocent person in order to save someone else. If the innocent person dies as a result of saving someone, it's a tragedy, but the goal is not "kill one person to save another," it's "try to save both if possible, even if one dies."

Abraham's Bosom/Paradise was a "city of refuge" for the righteous dead, where they waited until the death of the High Priest, Jesus Christ. Consider listening to this Theology Thursday episode where Pastor Enyart talked about cities of refuge in the Bible: https://kgov.com/cities-of-refuge...

The crust of the earth was called heaven because God intended for what He would create ON that crust to be a paradise. Literally heaven on earth. It wasn't until Adam sinned that God changed the location of "heaven" to be "above" this plane of existence.

You might want to catch up on what has transpired since then... https://www.lamag.com/culturefiles/elon-musk-rejects-twitter-board-seat/#:~:text=Just%20a%20week%20after%20he,tweeted%20the%20news%20Sunday%20evening.

See posts #270, 281, 283.

This is what happens when you cherry pick verses without understanding their context.

Saying it doesn't make it so, Tam. Supra.

Yes, one raqia, was created. However, there are two heavens mentioned. The first in Genesis 1:1, and later from the second part of day 3 onward. The second "heavens" was used as a name for the raqia that was created. Genesis 1:1 says that God created the heaven and the earth. And then...

Which is not the firmament of the heavens. Post #270 shows why this is flatly wrong. No, He tells us what He put in the "firmament of the heavens." Not the firmament. What He said was this: Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue...

By faith the harlot Rahab did not perish with those who did not believe, when she had received the spies with peace. - Hebrews 11:31 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Hebrews11:31&version=NKJV

Non-sequitur.

Saying it doesn't make it so. No one has ever claimed otherwise.

Wrong. They are in "the firmament of the heavens." Not "the firmament called heaven" Yes, we agree. BECAUSE: Space didn't need to be created, because there was nothing there to begin with! Then God put lights in the firmament of the heavens, firmly, figuratively, setting them in the sky. You...

Saying it doesn't make it so. So do we. Nope. The firmament that divided the waters was named Heaven, then the dry portion of it was called earth, and the waters on top of it were called seas. The sun, moon, and stars are in the firmament of the heavens, not in the crust of the earth...

It's not sharing the idea. It's sharing ACCESS to that idea. You do not have the right to take my idea and claim it as your own. I have the right to restrict access to my idea to only those who pay for it. If someone gains access to my idea without paying for it, it's called theft, because it's...

How about the people who aren't greedy and selfish, but just want to provide for themselves and their family? Imagine two men alone on an island. They could offer their services (perhaps one is a good builder, while the other is a good cook) to one another willingly. But that only works if...

Your premise is wrong. If someone buys a book, they buy a licence to read that book. The author of the book owns the rights to produce that book, without anyone being able to copy his work and claim it as his own, because that would be theft, of not only the book that was produced, but also of...

Then why did Moses not just use "firmament" throughout the entire chapter? Instead, he used "firmament" the first five times, and then "firmament of the heavens" the last four times. And he even made more of a distinction by using them ONLY on two separate occasions, the "firmament" he only...

So if a man comes up with an idea for something that no one else has thought of yet, he cannot sell access to his idea to provide for his family? How is that greedy?