Search results

The onus is on you to defend your position, Arty. This has earned you a ding.

The source of information has no bearing on the veracity of the information.

Yes, I'm aware. The reason they say this is that they've gotten away with it. There's no more point to pursuing a righting of this wrong, only to recognize that it did, in fact, happen.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/washington-secrets/new-report-255-000-excess-votes-for-biden-in-six-key-2020-states Over 250,000 votes in excess for Biden.

In a loving relationship, both husband and wife would consider themselves the property of the other, because the wife would "the husband's wife," and the husband would be "the wife's husband." Do you see the apostrophe-S after each of those words? That indicates possession. Possession, as in...

False, on both counts.

You're welcome. And? As Christians, we are to UPHOLD God's standard, not let it be pushed by the wayside by the wicked, and CERTAINLY not be apathetic as Christians and just give up because "God's law/standards hold no sway on earth currently." Apathy is a sin. I think the world would look...

https://theweeklyworldview.com/thats-entertainment/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. That’s Entertainment! Posted on April 3, 2022 Listen as America’s most attractive audio engineer and her host provide your weekly alternative...

So what? "Witnesses" are not limited to "eyewitnesses." So tell me why you wouldn't also do so in the bedrooms of homosexuals so that we could execute them for their crimes? Or would you?

Why would they walk?

Whoever is deserving of death shall be put to death on the testimony of two or three witnesses; he shall not be put to death on the testimony of one witness. - Deuteronomy 17:6 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy17:6&version=NKJV “One witness shall not rise against a man...

Why?

Couldn't find the thread I wanted to put this one in, so I'm starting a new one. We Open theists have said a few things about time, but the most important being that time, as an entity, doesn't really exist, it's simply how we describe sequence of events in relation to each other. Bob Enyart...

So you don't think God can be in two places simultaneously?

@Sherman You have a better understanding of this than I do. Maybe you could answer?

And science affirms (or at the very least, supports it). The Bible says to always be ready to defend your beliefs. It's one thing to believe that the flood happened in the 600th year of Noah's life, it's quite another to be able to defend it, especially when someone who rejects God's word...

The only "criminal record" a murderer, rapist, homosexual, kidnapper, etc, should have should be engraved in stone, particularly one placed at the head of their gravestone.

"Smoother" might be a better word than "flatter."

Not quite. Just call a spade a spade. Murder is when someone intentionally takes the life of a person without just cause or due process. You were once a "microscopic entity," too, Skeeter. Yet you were still a human being. The difference between your mouth and a womb is that one of those...

But that's not what the question is about. Why would it be okay to murder someone because their father was a rapist? Or, to put it in the context of your analogy: Why would it be ok to stop removing one of the people from under the rubble to shoot dead the one you can't save, even if there is...