Search results

Mechanisms for what? Saying it doesn't make it so.

Again, correlation does not equal causation. Supra. Who said anything about attention? What matters is the claim being made, not who makes it. If you're biased towards the expert, then when the expert is wrong, and the drunk is right, you'll reject what the drunk says, despite him being...

Humans are closer, genetically, to neandertals than a chimp is to another chimp. Nope. Just because similar lines of code are used in a program from another program doesn't mean that the two programs are related. This begs the question that there is something to have mutations occur in...

Ruling out impossibilities is how you do science. You can't get to that point without investigating claims. You can't do that if you're making appeals to popularity or making genetic fallacies. Generally speaking, humans are pretty capable at understanding things when they put their minds to...

No, that's a genetic fallacy. The truth of a claim is not dependent on who makes the claim. The quality of the claimant has nothing to do with whether a claim is true or false. This absolute claim is self-contradictory. This is the second absolute claim in a sentence where you deny that...

No, because the Bible says so. You're still not getting it. The "converted Jews," who were part of the New Covenant, are long dead. Presently, and since Paul's encounter with Christ on the road to Damascus, where he became the first Christian, there are NO members of the New Covenant alive...

What are you even talking about? Jesus Christ came and died for all men. The gospel of grace preached enables a man to believe (or choose not to believe) in Christ for Salvation. It's as simple as that. The belief is a RESPONSE to Christ coming and dying. It's not a spontaneous act. A man...

Why in the world would you think I'm talking about crime, b57? All crimes (that are actually crimes) are sin! Babies are innocent of ALL SIN! That's LITERALLY ALL THAT MATTERS, BELOVED57! The very fact that they HAVE NOT COMMITTED ANY SIN means they are, BY DEFINITION, INNOCENT! No, there...

Babies are innocent. Which doesn't say that babies sin. Thanks for conceding the entire point. Quit talking gibberish. Yet until it does, they are innocent, and there's no guarantee that they will live long enough for it to do so. So, the question is: Do babies go to heaven who die...

Video doesn't play. Then again, CNN is broken anyways...

Thanks for just repeating what I just said... So what sin do babies commit to put them in this state?

Except he's not talking about "every natural unregenerate person." (Also, you're spelling and punctuation sucks. Slow down when you type.) He's talking about "we" ... "who had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh," and "were by nature the children of wrath, even as the...

EXACTLY!

Thank you. Fixed.

Saying it doesn't make it so. Both of which are the same nation, just different portions, one being the Remnant, and the other being the portion that was cut off because of their unbelief. NEITHER of which are the Body of Christ. No such thing. Supra. Says the Bible. Israel pursued...

The best kind of right. There's no such thing as "Spiritual Israel." There's only the Remnant, the portion of Israel that trusted in Christ her Messiah, and the unbelieving Israel, which was cut off because of their unbelief. NEITHER of which have anything to do with the Body of Christ...

That's two churches, not one. Israel is Israel. The Body of Christ is the Body of Christ. There's no overlap. There's no such thing as "Israel after the Spirit." The High Priest was NEVER the sacrifice in Israel's customs. This is talking about the Body of Christ, not Israel. You're...

That makes you wrong. It's not a "new Israel." It's just the Remnant! The portion of Israel who was NOT cut off for its unbelief! The problem with calling them "new Israel" is that God isn't done with the unbelieving portion of Israel! Paul makes that extremely clear in Romans 9-11! Just...

EXACTLY!!!