Search results

No one here is saying that "WE make faith and repentance a condition in order to get God to save us." GOD is the one who made the condition for Him to save someone the requirement of faith/repentance. Not man. Faith isn't a work anyways. You make Christ out to be unjust by saying this...

Has a survival rate of over 99%.

AMEN! The only problem is that what you mean by "Church" is "the Body of Christ," and not "the congregation of Israel". Yes, it is indeed the same Jesus. No, it is not the same people. Amen! No, there is not. The New Covenant was put on hold at Paul's conversion, and while those who...

In case you've forgotten: https://kgov.com/constitution God liked monarchy enough to institute one in His own personal nation. If we're going to have a righteous government, modeling one after the nation He made is probably a good place to start. As for the laws we would use, one needs to...

The system I promote has only a 5% individual increase tax, which is dropped to 1% when the king estimates that the Treasury surplus can fund the government for seven years. That's it. That's the only tax there is. No government can function without a means of funding, hence taxation, hence why...

Humans aren't animals. Animals can't sin. Humans can. But stupid doesn't make you sin, sin makes you stupid.

And yet, the moment the gospel is preached and a natural man hears it, he is no longer "without God." He may still reject God, but he is no longer "without" Him. This verse doesn't say what you want it to say. A person who doesn't know about God cannot seek Him, obviously. On the other...

Not like this it hasn't, and NEVER has a vaccine been pushed out the door with such a lack of testing. The mandates that were enacted were tyrannical, and went against what has been standard practice for the past 3500 years, which is to quarantine the sick, and let the healthy go about their...

I seem to recall Jesus being not too happy with the publicans... And you claim to be a RE-publican. I'm not sure how that's at all relevant to what I said, or this thread, for that matter. Irrelevant to who leads a nation, if it's laws are unjust, and/or if its legal system is inherently...

None of what you say comes from the Bible.

Meaningless nonsense. That a person can have faith is because Christ came and died for him. It is BECAUSE God offers the gift of salvation to anyone that puts their faith in him that we can have faith. This verse doesn't support your position.

WHICH church? There are at least TWO in the New Testament. Conflating them only brings confusion. So what? Can't Christ be those things WITHOUT those things being the same thing? Neither of these passages support your position. The New Covenant was made SPECIFICALLY with Israel, not "men."

Any system that requires the use of lawyers to make sense of the law is inherently unjust, because it means that the law is being used as a weapon against the innocent. The government has no right to educate children, nor to provide a means for families to send their children off to government...

FALSE. None of these passages affirm the false teaching that the Body of Christ is Israel.

It's not false. And again, if it's not free, then it's not a will. No. Again, free will is not a superpower. Just because a man is free to choose doesn't mean he can save himself. The verse doesn't say what you want it to say. Thank God that He provided light, and that His gospel enables...

No, it's not. You say it in error. No, it doesn't. No, it doesn't promote that. The verse doesn't say what you want it to say, nor does it contradict the concept of wills being free. God being able to do what He pleases does not mean that man's will is not free. The verse doesn't say...

If you throw a stone at a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one that got hit. Except A) it's not illogical, because B) the Bible was written by God, the ULTIMATE authority, and thus, there is nothing inherently wrong with appealing to God, the Authority. He, quite literally, wrote the...

Duh. A scientist is a person who conducts scientific research to advance knowledge in an area of interest. In other words, anyone can be a scientist by simply doing research to advance knowledge in an area of interest. That includes the drunk, above. Who are you to discount his knowledge...

I have edited post #772 with additional thoughts regarding the "drunk vs expert" false dilemma posited by Skeeter.