Search results

I didn't ask if you "assumed" it, marke. Read the question again if you have to, then try again to answer.

Now answer the second half of that question: You realize that the people who copied those letters in order to share them with their brothers and sisters in Christ were not nearly as strict with their copying methods as those who later on were actually dedicated to the task of doing so to...

We know. In other words... "I'm right and you can't convince me otherwise." How about answering the question I asked, marke? Are you aware that in the case of Paul's Epistles at lest, Paul expected, even commanded, his letters to the churches and groups he wrote to to be copied and shared...

The problem is that tyou assume that ANY disagreement between texts is a major problem. Reality is that these "disagreements" you keep pointing to are usually so minor (such as "Christ Jesus" vs "Jesus Christ" or a similar way of saying the same thing) that the meaning of the text doesn't...

http://helpmewithbiblestudy.org/5system_moses/dh13_copyistError.aspx

You realize He was quoting the article that I linked to.... Right? Surely you can't be that stupid...

I think you need to carefully reread what Clete said, because you clearly misunderstood something.

You need to reread what he said.

This is what I've been saying this entire time. He still cannot provide any example from the texts that would cause me or anyone to reject what Will Duffy said in the sermon I mentioned earlier, nor the person he quoted.

Please take it to a new thread.

I literally just got done explaining this to him earlier. He ignored it. I'm not surprised you have to repeat it.

So you can't provide one shred of evidence that the texts contradict in a meaningful way, yet you expect me to believe you when you say that they do? What a joke! You're the one making the claim that the KJV is inerrant, marke! You can appeal to authority (a fallacy) all you like, but it...

No. We CAN say that we preach the word of God, and that the message contained within the Bible is correct, despite the errors the Bible contains, BECAUSE of the fact that God wrote a robust book that can survive a few errors creeping in. Inerrancy is a different matter altogether, though...

Well you know what they say about assuming things, because that's not what he said or is suggesting at all. It's not just a belief, marke. It's reality. NOT ONE of the Bibles in existence today are inerrant. That would imply perfection where humans are involved, and no human is perfect, let...

Just saw a (thankfully silenced) portion of a trailer for a new Disney movie in my instagram feed. It was for a live-action film version of "The Little Mermaid". Ariel (the main character) is supposed to be fair skinned, red lips, red hair, and large, aqua blue eyes, a mermaid through and...

Sorry, but there's no specific mention of any particular Bible version in that article. In other words, confirmation bias much?

I addressed this. You've seemingly ignored it.

Opinion. If you think the same doesn't apply to the KJV, you're naive. So what? https://www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/stewart_don/faq/words-bible/question4-original-manuscripts-of-the-bible.cfm As if that wasn't obvious... And I have "experts" who explain convincingly that the Bible is...

This is called "begging the question." It's a logical fallacy for a reason. No, it's not unclear. In fact, it's far more clear than any other Bible translation, simply because it has that footnote which gives an explanation on why it's included. Wrong. What it says is that the verses: "are...