Search results

Yes. It may not be as healthy for them spiritually, but yes.

Saying it doesn't make it so.

I'm not Jefferson.

So?

Wrong. A theocracy is "rule by God." That won't happen again until Christ's return. What I am advocating is theonomy, something different. Theonomy is a form of government that adheres to God's laws as the standard for morality and criminal justice, rather than man's laws.

Wrong. Indeed. It is not. False. What you describe as "civilized" is not. Evil people hate the enforcement of righteous law, because it means they cannot express their rebellion against God. No, they weren't. Yawn. You're calling evil good and good evil. Woe to you. Good thing...

Wrong. People who dismiss what is right are often guilty themselves. You keep using this term to refer to naziism and their ilk, but then also to people like myself, who are ACTUALLY on the far right. God doesn't appreciate you calling evil people good. Civilized society is brought about...

All I'm doing is asking you questions, trying to understand what you believe, and why you believe it. As iron sharpens iron, So a man sharpens the countenance of his friend. - Proverbs 27:17 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs27:17&version=NKJV

Yes, it is. No, that's just what you want it to be, in your rebellion against God. Correct. Only within marriage. So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and...

You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. - Leviticus 18:22 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus18:22&version=NKJV Why do you disagree with God? Because it should be.

Except that it is. Repeating yourself doesn't make your claim any less incorrect. Agreed. Those who choose not to get married do not have the right to have sex with each other. There you go! Now apply that to what was said. You never answered my question. God says that sex is to be...

None of my questions were "loaded with venom, disrespect, or hostility," marke.

Look, Marke. I have no problem with you disagreeing with my views. But at least the people who do can reason out their argument. You haven't done any such thing so far. You've merely pointed at examples and said "the punishments shouldn't be this or that" but never given a line of reasoning as...

You've got it backwards. They're under delusions because of their sin. Stupid doesn't make you sin, but sin makes you stupid.

You were refusing to answer my questions before I confronted you with your stubbornness with finding out what God has to say, so that's not a valid excuse. Marke, you should find out what God wants the punishments to be for crimes. His ways are just. Our current society's ways are not.

So you don't even care what God has to say about what punishments should be for certain crimes? What does that have to do with it? Are God's commands not out of love for His creation, and compassion for the victims? Which says absolutely nothing at all at what they should be. It also says...

Not MY business. It's the business of the Government. That's the context here. God says that sex is to be had only between a married man and woman. Why do you suppose He says so? You don't seem to understand what is meant by "discovered," or as Scripture puts it, "found out." Educate...

I gave you those because, aside from the first two, the punishments for them are defined by God in Scripture. How about this, if you can tell me what GOD thinks the punishments should be, I'll be satisfied. If you can't even do that, or refuse to even look it up, then that's a problem with...

Whoever developed that bot should be put on trial for murder.