Search results

What I think has nothing to do with it. Jesus did, in fact, insult her. There you go again, putting words in my mouth. I will not cast pearls before swine by trying to explain it to you. Of course there's a lesson to be learned. But it's not one I'm going to explain to you, for that...

I quoted 20 titles of articles on their home page yesterday. The site is made up by articles. Which of those articles are "bat crazy," Arty? Give me a number, out of those 20. A number, Arthur. Give me a number. I can't do ANY math without any numbers. Why are you stonewalling here??

Afaik, there are three words that mean "canopy" in Hebrew. None of them were used in Genesis 7.

Start a new thread then. No one has advocated for that. But we know you don't pay attention to what people are saying. Again, that's NOT what the current discussion is about. Straw man. No one has said that Jesus was flinging "puerile insults." What I said was that Jesus seriously...

The difference is that one is not "far right," but rather, far left, on an absolute morality scale. No, it's not balanced. It's been verifiably shown to be leftist. Then who? I went to the site, and I would claim that I have "some semblance of common sense," and I cannot tell that it is...

Again, that's not what is being discussed. What is being discussed is the following. This is clearly not the case, as I have demonstrated from scripture.

By this "far right," are you referring to "neo-nazis"? Or are you referring to the religious far right, such as myself? There IS a difference. We call it "leftist" because it IS leftist. Translation: "I, Arthur Brain, am doubling down on my position that Wikipedia is my authority on what is...

Again, the claim was: Arguing that certain kinds of rudeness are bad is a different discussion. Supra. Reminder: "dog" was a derogatory term for Gentiles. Jesus didn't even use that. He used the diminutive form of the word, basically "doggette," which is even more insulting!

Reminder, your claim was: Are you now changing your argument to "Christianity has no room for 'insulting for insulting's sake'"? If so, then I fully agree! But that wasn't what we were discussing.

So "God answering prayer while the words are still in one's mouth" means that someone had already finished asking a question or making a statement? How did you come up with that If the words are still in their mouth, then they haven't finished speaking! Think of it this way, pardon the...

Asking you questions is like pulling teeth from someone with their jaw clenched shut. There was a second part of that question that you still need to answer. Please answer it.

Jesus is the Way, the Truth, and the Light. He is also the Rock of Offense. Jesus was offensive to those who hate Him, the Truth, because truth is offensive to those who hate the truth. Jesus going to the cross to die for the sins of the world is itself offensive to those who reject Him...

So what figure of speech is being used, and what does it mean? Second time I'm asking.

Thanks for conceding the entire discussion.

What's your point? There is plenty in life that is NOT vanity that falls within what Solomon describes.

Yes. And?

Within the first 15 minutes, from what I've heard. I'll wait for it to show up on VidAngel. Probably going to go see Sound of Freedom this weekend, though.

You've been answered.

The truth is offensive to those who hate the truth. So yes, being rude and offensive is good when one is speaking truth.

A figure of speech? What figure of speech? What does this supposed figure of speech mean? That's not "God answering prayer while the words are still in one's mouth." That's not "God answering prayer while the words are still in one's mouth." Miraculous, sure. That's not "God answering...