Search results

Senators in the US Government are elected by the people of each state by popular vote. Meaning, they are chosen by the majority. That doesn't protect the minority from the majority. That reinforces the majority. The Senate does not protect the minority from the majority.

False. And certain men came down from Judea and taught the brethren, “Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.” https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts.15.1&version=NKJV Do you think these men were wrong in their beliefs that they held, that...

There was a lot of things that Bob did that were ahead of his time, and even a few firsts here and there.

The House of Representatives does not represent the minority, only the majority. One of the responsibilities of government is to protect the minority from the majority.

Dumbocrats are only half of the problem. It was Re-publican judges that GAVE US Roe. See posts #3 and #4. And #8.

Treating the symptoms will not fix the root problem. Guess where all of them come from: the three main branches of government.

The Supreme Court is not supreme, nor does it make good judgements.

The President of the United States does not lead.

https://kgov.com/bel/20111122

What am I missing? The Department of Justice does not care about justice. The Federal Bureau of Investigation does not investigate. The Department of Homeland Security does not secure our homeland. The Department of Transportation has made traveling a nightmare. The Border Czar (Kamala) has...

Been seeing that lately. What a tragedy. But that's "the way that leads to death" that is the result of sin.

So Jesus was lying when He said, "I am not come except for the lost sheep of the house of Israel? The settled view strikes again. Sorry, but I'm an open theist. I don't believe God knows the future. Thus, He couldn't have known whether she was going to be persistent in her faith, especially...

Denying reality isn't healthy, Arthur. Once again, no. He didn't. As stated before: Jesus insulted her because He was trying to get her to go away, because as He stated quite clearly: "It is not good to take the children's bread and feed it to the little dogs." Again: The children...

I did that. I didn't see anything wrong with it. Saying it doesn't make it so.

Apparently I do, because you CLEARLY do not understand how figures of speech work.

Saying it doesn't make it so.

It "doesn't occur to me" because that is not at all what he was doing... As Scripture is clear. In other words, you've decided that He said what you believe He said, and you're not willing to consider any other position no matter what.

Saying it doesn't make it so, and you refuse to demonstrate the claim.

He said as much. First He ignored her. Then He said to his disciples, "I am not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Then He said to her, "It is not good to take the children's bread and throw it to the little dogs." Why is that so hard for you to understand? Says the one...