Search results

@kjw47: <NO ANSWER, STILL> Either he is, or he isn't. Why do refuse to answer this question, kjw47?

Saying that does not whitewash your stupidity of using your adjective, "phony," to modify your noun, "animosity." What you have thereby ended up telling us is that Q did not stir up animosity against Democrats. To "stir up animosity" that is phony would be to stir up no animosity. Duh. Back to...

Don't you get it, idiot? You just called something "animosity," but then turned around and said that it is phony. What is that but for you to admit that what you are calling "animosity" is not animosity? You're obviously too dumb to even come up with a complaint, let alone to coherently frame...

What is "phony Christian animosity"? Is it animosity pent up in phony "Christians" like you?

What I mean is that their goal is to stir up public animosity against Christians, in hope of ultimately weaponizing the leftardized hordes against Christians.

LOL That's by far the most intelligent thing you've ever said on TOL, Greatest poser ever!

I asked you: Lawson: <NO ANSWER> It's sad that you throw tantrums because you can't answer elementary questions of semantics about the things you choose to say. Why you can't answer them is simply because you are using your words entirely emotively, rather than in a cognitively meaningful...

What (if anything) do you mean by that? Or, are you just treating us to the spectacle of another of your mindless emotional outbursts? Thinking logically is clearly something you refuse to do. IOW: "Polly wanna cracker. Squawwwwk."

Why not just ask yourself, proud dolt? It sure looks like you're more than happy to receive your own, mindless babbling. Since you're obviously emotionally invested in standing by your rank stupidity of asserting your cherished falsehood that words mean things (against the truth that only...

What vicious, Putin-loving, Christ-despising leftard Nazis like @User Name (Greatest poser ever) and @Arthur Brain (spilled nacho) are doing when they go about shamelessly trumpeting such lies against Americans is they are trying to stir up mindless mob resentment against Americans and—if they...

What "evidence" do you have for your claim that what you choose to call "evidence," is evidence?

What do you mean by your phrase, "meaning of homework"? Are you saying that the word, 'homework,' means something? It doesn't. Words don't mean things. Persons mean things by the words they speak, when they are speaking meaningfully. Words themselves...really they just kind of sit there...

You say Jesus is a god. Is Jehovah a god? Also, since you say Jesus is a god, whose god would you say Jesus is?

I asked you: kjw47: <NO ANSWER> Either God the Father is your king, or He is not your king. Which is it? Why do you refuse to answer this question? kjw47: <NO ANSWER> Either you are subject to God the Father, or you are not subject to Him. Which is it? Why do you refuse to answer this...

You had said: So, I asked you: kjw47: <NO ANSWER> Is your president, Nathan Knorr, a leader of a kingdom? Yes or No?

There, once again, you're refusing to answer the question I had asked you: Is God the Father your king? Yes or No? Are you subject to God the Father? Yes or No?

Since Jesus only does His Father's will, and (as you say) Jesus could have failed, then is it His Father's will for Jesus to fail?

So, your president, Nathan Knorr is a leader of a kingdom?

Why?

Nobody asked if you said "Jesus is king of eternity". I asked you if you call Jesus "King of eternity". Do you? Yes or No? Why resumes? Had YHWH left off "being-King of eternity" so that He needs to resume "being-King of eternity"? If so, then who would you say is "being-King of eternity" in...