Search results

But you need Trump's "vaccine" injected into your bloodstream—Trump, whom you leftards seem to consider to be a Russian agent? Your priorities are as insane as you.

What have you handed us, here? Let's see. false proposition 1: '7djengo7 is (at time t) playing basketball with @Stripe' false proposition 2: '7djengo7 is (at time t) reading the Bible with @JudgeRightly' You show your ignorance of logic by claiming that these two, false propositions...

That's false. No false proposition contradicts, or is contradictory to, any false proposition. Also, no true proposition contradicts, or is contradictory to, any true proposition. Every thing that is false is a proposition. Every thing that is true is a proposition. Propositions do not...

What do you mean by your phrase, "degree of similarity"? How do you imagine you avoid binarity by saying "degree of similarity"?

Here, you are admitting that at least some of the propositions affirmed by the Bible are true. One of every two propositions that constitute a pair of contradictories is true, and the other is false. IOW, you've just admitted to us the truth that not every proposition affirmed by the Bible is...

I see you've altered your post since I quoted it in my post, #826. Initially, you had written "humans," which puzzled me. But now you've replaced that with "animals". I note, though, that you just quietly changed it, that you had not the courtesy to acknowledge to us your transcription mistake...

Why do you say that? I'm not seeing that it says man was created before animals.

Ah, random citations with zero commentary from the Bible-despising Darwinist. How original and unexpected! I guess you must've forgot whatever it was you had wanted to "prove".

Man is not humans? Humans are not man? "it says both" Maybe cite chapters and verses for us so we can see what you're talking about.

IOW, Darwinist claims are "evidence" for Darwinist claims. Darwinistspeak is "evidence" that Darwinistspeak is true, eh?

Saying the Bible is not true "rehabilitates the Bible" how? Logic is binary. You despise binary thinking because you despise logic.

To evidence? Or, instead, to what you, being a Darwin cheerleader, erroneously choose to call "evidence"? Which? IOW, you don't want to talk about, or present any evidence. You prefer, instead, to hand us Darwinistspeak, and to call such non-evidence, "evidence."

Wake up out of your coma, you comma-hating idiot. You only say that because you're an illiterate idiot. Try proving that it's true, poser. You only say that because you're an illiterate idiot. Try proving that it's true, poser. (Oh, and your "and after your initial...either" is wrong. If...

One aspect of your mental degeneracy is your irrational hatred of proper punctuation mark usage, which hatred is manifest in your constant tantrum over commas, as well as by your refusal to use them where they are called for. For example (one of many, many, many): Wrong: Right: Because...

That's right, you tired troll. You're being exposed as a farter-into-your-own-face again, because you refuse to answer even the simplest questions about things you've chosen to say.:geek:

Way to go with your exemplary grammar, you vicious hypocrite/troll.

Arthur Brain said to me: So I asked him: Arthur Brain: <NO ANSWER> Arthur Brain: <NO ANSWER>

What term? Did I say you were using some term improperly?

Christian: That which is God-loved (loved by God) is that which is good; that which is good is that which is God-loved. Fool: Well, answer me this, Theist: Is something God-loved because it is good, or is it good because it is God-loved? Christian: Because that which is God-loved is that which...

Give him what User Name calls "wisdom," or give him what God calls "wisdom"? Nobody understands meaningless platitudes. Successful at what? What did you pray for Trump to succeed at?