Search results

IOW, you will give us some Darwinistspeak that you erroneously choose to call "evidence," which fails to show that the earth is billions of years old.

There there, User Name, there there. Be comforted, broken-hearted one. What's a "QAnon user"? Is this a "QAnon user"? ⬇️ Is this a "QAnon user"? ⬇️

"Let your wings take dream!" —Dubya

I couldn't? Oh, OK. What "argument"? Spare me. It looked like raving. I don't even assume you understand what you wrote in your last post. No. No logic leads to that. Personally, I would not use a nonsense phrase like "psychopathic logic," because it is oxymoronic and just silly.

"Ecclesiastics"?? Oh, yeah, Bible-despiser. You sure know your stuff, don't you!

Here, once again, you have reasserted your unproved claim: LOL On 11 August 2022, you had already claimed that same thing: The next day, 12 August 2022, you were confronted about that claim of yours: Now, almost a month later, on 8 September 2022, you are sitting there, once again, just...

What that I said triggered you to say that? I had no idea. But who said he would not do so? I didn't.

What has nothing to do with people agreeing with Gates? Demonstrate what? That something has to do with whether or not he sees them as useful to his objectives? I've absolutely zero doubt that that is true. I'm just confused as to exactly what question is the present bone of contention in...

You mean useful idiots whose minds have been pacified and stultified into believing Bill Gates does not have them under target? Whatever other agreement they may have, or think they have with him, I doubt they would agree with him politically on the particular issue of his meaning to kill them...

@ffreeloader, you remind me of me. @TomO, you remind me of me. :ROFLMAO:

You're right about the Bible, here. The Bible only requires one to believe that the flood covered all the earth, all the dry land that God had created. The Bible does not require one to believe that the flood covered the waters, the seas.

To what "dreadful slander" are you referring? Exact verbatim quotation and http url to the source text, please? Too much to ask?

That's one interesting difference between you and rationally-thinking people. You have no scruples against calling getting stuff wrong, "science."

Did it put a smile on your face, or are you just shamelessly lying through your teeth again, joker? If it did, why did it? What? What (if anything) do you mean by "righteous indignation"? What do you mean by that?

I'm merely affirming truth, and if you need to call that "judging me," why, I've no quarrel with that at all. To judge is merely to affirm a proposition. Every proposition has/is about a subject. I'm judging—which is to say, affirming—true propositions. And you happen to be the subject of...

You're shamelessly lying through your teeth. You've already shown your colors, your nasty disposition. You don't know how little I care whether or not you take umbrage at me for my pointing out your hatred and opposition against God and His Word. I believe the Bible, whereas you do not...

See, here's yet another example of you loudly and proudly advertising that you want to not be taken seriously by rationally-thinking people. Why would you call a stick, "science"? That's just an idiotic thing to do. Why do you choose to call what you choose to call "science," "science"...

Do you believe? If you do, and you call your believing a "work," could you please tell us to what end you are performing this "work" of yours? What do you say you are achieving by this "work" of yours? Or, do you want to tell us, instead, that your "work" of believing is just pointless?

Why not? Do you agree, then, that the stuff you have been claiming here, in your hatred of and opposition against the Bible, is false? What would you do differently in these threads than you've been doing, if you did want us to buy the stuff you have been claiming? What about your claims...

What creationists are actually against is the corpus of falsehood, nonsense, and irrational thinking that you and your fellow, committed-to-error Bible-despisers reverently choose to misname "science". You're a parrot when it comes to that word, and your constant mindless chanting of "science"...