Search results

I don't see a source, could you point it out here: ----- Was everything that they said wrong? Or just some of it? How do you know which parts are wrong and which are not? Fathers of the Physical Sciences who velieved in the Creator God (or at least the ones relative to this discussion)...

Source? Then why even bring it up at all? So if you were to travel down the tracks, the distance between them would get smaller and smaller as you traveled? They aren't parallel? Or do the tracks spread apart when Dave approaches them? :kookoo:

Here. We. Go. https://i.imgur.com/WI9ePTE.jpg https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/6je76h/the_sun_photographed_from_the_same_spot_at_the/ https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/6je76h/slug/djdk2e0

I'd say his heavenly FOV (field of view) is set to a really high number. . . . . (For those who don't get it, FOV determines how much you can see on your computer screen in a videogame. Google FOV for more info. Anyways, a higher FOV tends to make things at the edges of the screen larger...

E.G. XXy or Xyy

If a person has an X and a Y chromosome, the person is male. If the person has two X chromosomes, the person is female. Anything else is a mutation and is not natural. I said evidence, not proof, but it hardly matters. Do you want to know what that evidence is? Request a free copy of this...

No, the only thing that would truly undermine Christianity is if Christ did not rise from the grave. If He did not, then all Christians are fools. But if He did, then the entire Bible is true, and those who do not repent of their sins are in big trouble. Christ affirmed what Moses wrote, and...

That does not at all answer my questions Dave. First question, A or B? Second question, A or B? Read the verse I quoted, Dave, and answer A or B for both questions. Then, and ONLY THEN, will I answer your question.

You still have not answered my questions, Dave, and you now seem to be ignoring them. Please answer them: First of all, which model (using the verse below) describes God's majesty as greater, the flat earth model, where everything above the earth is just an image/hologram, or the model that the...

Dave, you're the one not paying attention. You know what a crescent moon is, correct? Which portion of the moon in that picture is a crescent? Which portion is darker, the crescent or the rest? Which portion do you think is being illuminated by the sun? By earthshine? Is the part lit up by...

Still waiting on the answers to these two questions, Dave.

It's called exposure time, David, something I thought you might know about, since you seem (or at least claim) to know so much about cameras.

Dave, please stop trying to obfuscate and clearly answer the questions I asked you: First of all, which model (using the verse below) describes God's majesty as greater, the flat earth model, where everything above the earth is just an image/hologram, or the model that the earth is a globe...

Dave, please stop trying to obfuscate and clearly answer the questions I asked you: First of all, which model (using the verse below) describes God's majesty as greater, the flat earth model, where everything above the earth is just an image/hologram, or the model that the earth is a globe...

I'd say that generally speaking, our senses are pretty reliable. Dave, First of all, which model (using the verse below) describes God's majesty as greater, the flat earth model, where everything above the earth is just an image/hologram, or the model that the earth is a globe spinning in...

From last night: https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/6dxfqr/a_15_second_exposure_of_tonights_crescent_moon/ http://i.imgur.com/1UFgbzS.jpg

Dave, here's an interview with one of the men who ACTUALLY in fact walked on the moon. http://kgov.com/astronaut-alan-bean-moonwalker-interview

https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/6cgask/hey_check_out_this_view/ No, the roundness of the earth in this gif is not caused by a fisheye lens.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBDZtt0vWD8