Search results

Dave, enough with the insults. I get it. You don't like me or what I have to say. That doesn't give you the right to call me an idiot. Either reply in a civilized manner, or don't reply at all.

Dave, perhaps you should compare what the ISS sees with it's location, to see if it's seeing what it should see if it really is up in space. You can do this by viewing this website, while watching the live feed from here. Dave, a live video feed is MUCH harder to fake than one that's...

I think you're splitting hairs over unimportant details. It's perfectly acceptable to call a "'virtual' sphere" a sphere.

Dave, you seem to be conflating "computer-altered"/"computer-enhanced" with "computer generated." Please stop. They do not mean the same thing.

Oh, so you don't really care about what other people have to say when they present their evidence for a globe earth? You think you can just ignore what's being said?

Respond to the arguments being made then, and not just your twisting of them to make them seem like they don't mean anything.

http://listverse.com/2010/12/04/8-greatest-antarctic-explorers/ My point is your argument is faulty at best. Make a better argument.

Refresh your page. I wasn't finished when I first posted my comment. I have since finished it. And no, they don't, dave. They shouldn't even come near antarctica if the earth is flat, yet you yourself even admitted that they "only skirt the edge" of Antarctica. So you still have to explain why...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2883739/The-GREY-planet-True-colour-image-reveals-Earth-really-looks-like-space-without-filters-editing.html

You're missing the point. If the earth is flat, then the airlines are wasting millions of pounds of fuel in flight due to traveling in one long curve, and not in a straight line to their destination. Why would they do? So what about Sir Edmund Hillary? Nobu Shirase? Sir Edgeworth David? Robert...

Dave, all you have to do to find proof that what I'm saying is true is to search the internet, just like you do with your flat earth conspiracy nonsense, because you clearly haven't learned anything in this thread.

[DELETE]

Dave, do you even know what space is? I'll tell you what it is, in case you didn't know. Space (the region above our atmosphere, where the stars, planets, and moons are) is literally a vacuum. It's empty. And it's a long way in between items of any significant size. Dave, does location affect...

Dave, you do realize that we can create vacuums here on earth, right? Not to mention that WE'VE BEEN TO SPACE!!!

I presented my argument already. Go back and do the experiment.

-facepalm- Dave, the photo that Clete took IS in atmosphere, so there's a difference between it and the moon. Light passes through atmosphere DIFFERENTLY than it does through vacuum.

You need an experiment that is to scale to show you how the universe works, Dave, so that you can stop presenting arguments that go against this assumed reality you're arguing against. Go do the experiment I presented above, then come back and make the same argument you just presented.

Dave, one thing to keep in mind is that that photo was taken in an atmosphere. There's no atmosphere on the moon. That's why the terminator line is so sharp.

The sky is black from a lack of light, and the sun being on the other side of the earth. Also, I already told you how, and told you an experiment that shows you EXACTLY how the sun can still shine on the moon. WRONG. See above. See above.

I will reply to this and to your previous comment later when I have time, because you just contradicted yourself slightly, though you may not have noticed it.