Search results

So what? The LXX is a translation of the Hebrew texts. Translating from Hebrew to Greek (or from any language to any other language, for that matter) guarantees a loss of information. Things get "lost in translation," as it were. The Hebrew uses a plural forms for the verb "make," and the...

Now if Christ is preached that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen.And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and your faith is also empty.Yes, and...

What even are you talking about? So you're calling Jesus a liar? Allow me to word this in a way that makes sense to your modern ear:" "...although the works from the foundation of the world were finished." The prepositional phrase, "from the foundation of the world," is modifying "works,"...

VVVVVVV

Read this! | | | | V

Appeal to the stone. Make the argument, Glorydaz. An argument made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. I didn't do an in-depth Bible study on the verse before posting that, GD. What do you think it means? God created everything that was created. Time isn't being...

https://kgov.com/nice You're free to do as you wish. If you think that what I have said does that, then point it out to me, and show me how keeping it with other things you've said should change my response. Indeed. Because And yet, I'm pretty sure I've posted the most scripture so far...

It is. God is describing what he will do in those circumstances. Saying it doesn't make it so. "A convention of language used to convey information about the sequence and duration of events relative to other events." "Time of life" here is a figure of speech which means a woman's menstrual...

It's a convention of language. It doesn't exist, like a car, wallet, or computer does. It's how we describe sequence. More begging the question. You have yet to establish that God created time. Again, this is begging the question that time is a thing that was created. "Things invisible"...

Probably. * In The Day That You Eat Of It: Jesus said, "I say unto you", over a hundred times. Christ's words are in the place of the Old Testament's four hundred plus, "Thus saith the Lord". For He is God. So with authority the Lord said, "Most assuredly, I say unto you, if anyone keeps My...

Time isn't a "thing." It's a concept. It's a convention of language. No. Post 382.

If you cannot understand a book written for grown ups, you should not talk about it. (Paraphrased from a C.S. Lewis quote.)

"In the day" is a figure of speech that refers to a longer period of time. It itself is not a "day." Genesis 2:4 4 This is the history of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens,

So God went from [not being a man] to [being a man.] (While still remaining as God, of course.) That's sequence. A change. Thus, your entire argument up to now has been disproven. Now you're arguing my position. Thanks.

I know very well what it says. It says nothing about time being created. It says the heavens, the earth, and light, were created on the first day. It says nothing at all about time being created. Through reason. You cannot create something that requires itself to be created. Thus, "before...

Do you believe God was always a man? Of course He was.

8 - God Says He Repents and Changes His Mind and His Actions and actions are not words, so reversing an action cannot be a mere figure of speech; for example, putting a man on a throne and then repenting by removing him is an action and not conceivably a mere figure of speech; and God of course...

Just because God does not change in certain ways (He is just, loving, merciful, gracious etc...) Doesn't mean he is utterly immutable. In fact, we have plenty of scripture that shows that God changes. The primary scripture that shows this are the verses that describe God as coming to earth as...

I'm literally quoting scripture in defense of my argument, and you're calling it my opinion? Get real. Which has nothing to do with this discussion. Who's the one who posted posts 368, 369, 371, 374, and 382, again? Is all I have opinions? Or do I have scripture to back up what I'm saying...

And? So what? MAKE THE ARGUMENT. Simply quoting scripture won't do, because I agree with scripture.