Search results

Is Jesus God? Yes. Did Jesus change? Yes. Therefore, God changed. The Father and the Sone and the Holy Spirit are ONE GOD, Leatherneck. Therefore, a change in one NECESSITATES a change in the others. I'll do you one better, I'll give you a passage that shows the Father, the Son, AND the...

Just because God cannot change in ONE way doesn't mean He cannot change in ANY way. Jesus (God) became a man. That's a change. Jesus (God) increased in wisdom. That's a change. Jesus (God) humbled Himself and became obedient. That's a change. That's three examples FROM SCRIPTURE that show God...

Just speaking is changing, LN. First you pronounce the "I," then the "ch" "a" "n" "ge" "n" "o" "t" A sequence. Which is, inherently, a change.

https://theweeklyworldview.com/revelation/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. Revelation Posted on January 2, 2022 Join America’s most attractive audio engineer and her host for a revealing review of the news of the day through...

Not ironic. Just sad.

No, you haven't. Unfortunately for you, The onus is on you to show where you have. Since you have not, you cannot. John Piper's illustrations show that you are wrong.

No, you don't. Clearly, you don't.

You just responded to something I had addressed several pages ago, and you claim you're not lagging? Riiiiiight...

So it doesn't mean exactly what it says, woodenly literally?

That's what it means, LN, whether it says it explicitly or not. You missed the semicolon. It's a new part of the sentence.

@Leatherneck did the entire city of Jerusalem, all Judea, and the whole literal region around the Jordan river come out to John as he was baptizing people? Then Jerusalem, all Judea, and all the region around the Jordan went out to him - Matthew 3:5...

And then it says, "Therefore you sons of Jacob are not consumed." “Behold, I send My messenger, And he will prepare the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, Will suddenly come to His temple, Even the Messenger of the covenant, In whom you delight. Behold, He is coming,” Says the Lord of...

It means exactly what it says within the context that it says it. It doesn't mean what you want it to say.

Saying it doesn't make it so. No, you haven't.

That's nice. What he said he teaches from the Bible. I don't agree with everything he says either, but here he's dead-on correct, and he shows logically how your position cannot be true. The article completely destroys your position. And I'm not exaggerating when I say that.

You apparently don't know the meaning of the word "context." The context of something cannot be itself. "if you yank a verse out of context it is nothing more than a pretext." LN: immediately does just that. Do you see the problem yet? I've addressed Malachi 3:6 already. It has nothing to...

No one is saying that quoting scripture is a logical fallacy. We're saying that you are begging the question, because you are, in fact, begging the question. And Clete has addressed those verses multiple times in this thread, and not once did you even recognize it.

Again, no one said the Father died. Wrong. Which do not mean "immutable." Wrong. He "declares" the end from the beginning. Not "knows." Wrong.

Jesus the Son was separated from the Father. No. We're not saying the Father died. We're saying the Son died.

After an action on their part? No. John Piper disagrees: https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/is-faith-meritorious