Search results

Needs are not rights. Agreed. Parents should be responsible and care for their children. "he's" The child has the right to life from conception to death by old age. He does not have a right, at any time, to the things you keep calling "essentials." WhY? How often do you think this...

Taking a child away from his parents is, by definition, kidnapping. Appeal to the stone. False. It provides justice for his death, and deters other parents from neglecting their children. Nice straw man. Duh. Needs are not rights. A childs needs should be met by his parents. The...

To protect the dignity of the woman. From reality. False. Yes, they do, generally speaking. False. So what? No one is saying this. In fact, we're saying the child has the inalienable right to life, from which all other (actual) rights extend, and from conception, not just birth...

He's quite a hypocrite, isn't he?

Under a righteous law What I believe has nothing to do with it. Yes, only the government has the right to impose laws. Again, my beliefs have nothing to do with this. No one has said anything about religion but you, Arty. "Personal freedom and liberty" does not include murdering the...

So God does things that don't make any rational sense at all? Speaking in parables that can't be understood to dead men that cannot hear doesn't make any sense.

So if the spiritually dead man cannot hear, then why does God need to speak in parables that he can't understand?

False. Wrong. The double standard was implemented by God to protect women. Sure it does. It's how God made man.

By the way, this channel had the clip first:

Especially when you're dealing with people like this...

It might for the lower class, and even less so for the lower-middle class, but for the upper-middle and upper classes, all they have to do is throw money at the problem and they get to have sex with as many women as they want and can afford. Which doesn't solve the problem. No, the only...

Also, whoremonger... That double standard was implemented by God Himself. There's a reason for it. God made men to have a strong sex drive. He made women to have a weaker sex drive, but to be more emotionally driven. Man and woman complement each other, and in a proper marriage, the man's...

The one that is conceived as a result of having sex. Correct, because it teaches people that there are consequences to one's actions, while simultaneously providing a solid foundation for any children that are born as a result of their inability to control their lusts. Think of it this way...

@Hoping

Yes, they should, for the sake of the child. Or do you not care about the child? Of course they will. But they shouldn't. The natural consequence of having sex is that a baby, a human being, is conceived. The natural consequence of not feeding one's child is that the child dies. Then I...

And a man and a woman who are not married, if they are caught, should be married, and not allowed to divorce, for the sake of any children born out of that wedlock. Then they shouldn't be having sex. Again, if they have sex outside of marriage, then they should be prepared to face the...

This is a reminder that TOL is a Trinitarian board, and that such comments are regarded as blasphemy (because they are), and as such, you will receive an infraction for intentional blasphemy for making such comments.

No, it doesn't mean that, as Clete pointed out in the posts I linked to. LOGOS means "reason" or "logic." It's where we get our word "logic" from, and is partly where we get the meaning from "biology," "theology," "geography," (-logy comes from "logos")

I mean, his username IS "Arthur Brain." He don't like that, because they won't support the gub'mint providin' fo' the chill'ins.

As a cat owner, I wish!