Search results

Ridiculous.

As this website proves multiple times a day, saying it doesn't make it so. Evolutionists can say anything they want. It doesn't make it true nor even scientific. There are actually several environmental factors that have been shown to be able to affect DNA. It does not create it but that...

The force of gravity (F) between two masses is equal to the gravitational constant (G) times the mass of both bodies divided by the square of the distance between the two bodies. From Wikipedia... In modern language, the law states: Every point mass attracts every single other point mass by a...

I despise the term 'microevolution' but otherwise, this statement is true and can be easily observed. This statement is only true in the fact that it accurately describes the concept of macroevolution. Macroevolution not only has not been observed, it cannot be observed and is therefore not...

No one has suggested that an analogy proves anything. It doesn't change the fact that the analogy is perfect. No, it doesn't. I've already directly addressed this. The mechanism holding the atmosphere to the Earth is the exact same mechanism that is holding you to the Earth. GRAVITY The fact...

A short Dandelion weed is not a hybrid version of a tall one. It's simply a different expression of the Dandelion weed's genetic code. And yet, in spite of not being a "hybrid", the shorter one's have a survival advantage in my front yard because there are these crazy humans that come along with...

Nope! It is not "absolutely" true. It is relatively true. For what feels like the 50th time. Motion of an object is only meaningful RELATIVE to another object. So your brother's face is motionless RELATIVE to the car. It is still moving relative to the road on which the car is driving. Since the...

Excellent point.

Dave, What, specifically, do you find contradictory about the concept of gravity? I emphasize "the concept" because I don't believe either of us are qualified to debate Einstein's theories and, even if we were, I think you and I are mostly in agreement in regards to the contradictory nature...

You know I do. Why do you ask? If you are attempting to suggest that the theory of evolution beleives that nature makes decisions via some sort of thought process then, again, I have to wonder just what it is that you're up too here, David. I seriously reject the notion that you are this...

Your brother's face is moving. It's in a moving car and unless the car is leaving your bother's face behind then his face is moving too, as is the air in the car. Your breath is inducing even more movement which is relative to the car and everything else in the car including your bother's face...

Yes, I did. I really don't like the format on this new version of vBulletin. The habits I've formed on it cause me to miss quite a lot of posts, I suspect. Basically, because of the limited time I have to do this - usually in the mornings just before work - if you don't quote my post or mention...

Incidentally, I almost didn't post the above because it concedes ground that isn't justified. Let me explain... The fact that very few (or even none - if there were actually none at all) flights go directly over the South Pole only proves that there is no demand for planes to do so. It isn't...

Dave, I last asked you just what it was about gravity that you considered to be self-contradictory. Did you ever answer? If so, can you tell me the post number, I seem to have missed it. Clete

Wikipedia on Polar flight plans... Antarctica Few airlines fly between cities having a great circle route over Antarctica. Direct flights between South Africa and New Zealand would overfly Antarctica, but no airline has scheduled such flights. LATAM Airlines flies nonstop between Auckland...

One cool way of doing the exact same experiment but with the help of modern technology is to use a GPS unit or use an iPhone app to determine your exact latitude. Then on the solstice, get a stick and take as careful a measurement as you can figure out how to make and then do the math and see...

I don't disagree with the point you are making here but just to be precise, it isn't natural selection that is the contradiction, it's evolution. Natural selection happens all the time. In fact, you can induce natural selection to occure rather easily. This is where we get antibiotic resistant...

Nope. The analogy is perfect - perfect. Read it again. Yes, we can. When you drive your car and you see a sign go by, is the sign moving or is the car and you in it? It's precisely the same with the Earth. You see the Sun go by but it is the Earth that is moving. The only reason you can feel...

I bought a bird feeder. I hung It on my back porch and filled It with seed. What a beauty of a bird feeder it was, as I filled it, lovingly with seed. Within a week we had hundreds of birds taking advantage of the continuous flow of free and easily accessible food. But then the birds started...

Okay, so hit me with what you consider to be the biggest flaw in the global construct.