Search results

I continued the discussion; why are you upset about it? Sin implies redemption? Then Christ's sacrifice wasn't necessary, was it? We could argue over who jumped to absurdity sooner... Using what you've written, it's hard to know which is superior, since part of yours is not from the bible...

Loosed from what? A sinful condition? Where do we see a sinful condition described for animals? And what are the ramifications? The closest I can find is the mandate given to Noah to kill any animal that kills a human. There you have the sin and the remedy, if that's what it is. Jesus Christ...

Fantastic post, way 2 go! You actually answered my questions. I don't agree with your answer, but it was well worded. Can you tell me how sin could "revive" in someone? Can something "revive" that has never been alive? So sin must have been alive in him already, and had died in some way, don't...

How can you tell an evil animal from a good one? I.e., where are the ten commandments for animals, and are they different for different species? Interesting thought. For some reason, God thought it necessary for His son to become one of the type of creatures that He wanted to redeem. Does that...

As an argument from the silence the opposite could just as easily be true...that no one used the keys of the kingdom to loose pets on earth, where they would then be loosed in heaven, so no dogs in heaven. My point is that the standard you've chosen is not applicable to the topic.

Do you think dogs go to heaven?

You might not get an answer, so why don't you tell the rest of us your point.

And here all this time I thought you looked like Granny!

Hello! Good way to start your post. Let's all give glory to God for His marvelous works! At least we can converse about them.and hopefully find answers. Some things about God we might never understand. Dogs are certainly interesting creatures. I'm not as fond of them as you apparently are...

Maybe he's talking about himself? Just as likely, since he won't explain why he uses it.

Agreed..."in the [same] day" Not sure why this is important, but they are guilty as soon as they commit the sin. They are still guilty days, months, years later. Punishment may or may not occur at some later date. Never said it was arbitrary, but your statement should end with, "it was the...

I don't think I have, since "eat" isn't a time word, it's an action that the time words are addressing. The other is "die". Both occur "in the [same] day", which is what we should be attmpting to define. Do you agree?

This came upon another thread and I had to read it a couple times Both of Tambora's posts (this one and the next in the other thread) about this say essentially the same thing, that the phrase "who is, and who was, and who is to come" refers to Jesus Christ. While that is true a few verses...

Doser's playing by the rules as far as I can see. He told me he wasn't supposed to mention them, and he didn't. I asked further to make sure I wasn't violating some rule I didn't know about. But I also didn't tag anyone.

Somebody not playing nice in the sandbox, eh?

Are you not allowed, or are we not allowed? Or are you just trying not to invite him to the conversation (understandably)?

Like this one? " If you're dumb enough to think that society would tolerate child molestation then you're just another nut with a debunked slippery slope fallacy." Post in thread 'For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud'...

Can you find some of those posts by said experts? Name some names, perhaps?

I see no reason not to assume the same kind of numbers for pre-K, do you? And is there any reason not to think the percentages have grown over the last 20 years?

Slippery slope is a straw man like the great reset is a conspiracy theory.