Search results

State force is violence, or at least a threat thereof. Carefully read the question I asked you:

@Eric h: <NO ANSWER, STILL>

@Eric h: <NO ANSWER>

How exactly do you intend to take people's possessions non-violently?

If you think he owes them, and he disagrees, what do you intend to do about it? You're not gonna do anything about it sans enacting violence against him, or at the very least making threats of violence against him. I hope it can't be that you're as stupid as you sound! I mean, do you really...

That's you gnashing your teeth in rage, commie. Stop coveting our wealth. Stop meaning to enslave us, hypocrite.

It was wrong of you to storm Capitol Hill, you violence-loving leftard.

I wouldn't assume you own anything, since commies say that ownership is theft. What do you mean by "weapons"? So, when you say you're going to try to take some peoples' wealth from them against their wills, to redistribute it among those to whom it does not belong, you don't mean you're going...

The Los Angeles Times article's title is insidious commie propaganda. Nothing that commie Gavin Newsome is demanding is in any way, shape, or form, reparations, for anything. Reparations are what he and his fellow commie scum owe to millions of Californians whom he has preyed upon as governor.

You love some violence, and are strongly for it, obviously. Without at least threats of violence, there's no getting the wealth you commies covet out of the hands of its owners. You hate people who have never been slavers, but whose wealth you want to steal from them by means of the state...

@Hoping: <NO ANSWER>

Yet, as I pointed out, you said Jesus, Who is not a sinner, has repented of sin: So, you've told us Jesus had no need to repent from sin, but that He has repented of sin, anyway.

Town Cluck

In my view, it'd be a third...though an unusually-timed election, midway through his unusual 2020-2024 second term. I've no doubt he won, and Brandon lost. The last trump.😁

By agreeing that only sinners can/do repent from sin, you are flat out contradicting your claim that non-sinners can/do repent from sin. But your sin-degenerated mind despises logic, and relishes your incoherence, so that you are vainly proud of yourself for your self-contradiction.

That is just the latest of countless instances throughout this thread of you sinning by taking God's name in vain. (As well as of you showing that you have some sort of mental impairment that makes you always feel you need to put a space before an exclamation mark or a question mark.)

Jesus is not a sinner. So, what you have just told us is that Jesus has repented of sin. Only sinners repent of sins, you Christ-hating sinner. Non-sinners have no sins, so non-sinners never repent of sins. Sinner, your God-blaspheming heresy is, at its core, your sin of calling your sin...

Believe what? What Jesus says, or what you say? I beleve what Jesus says, not what you say, as you do not say what Jesus says. And Jesus says nothing here about never giving up the ghost; this verse has nothing to do with the fact you irrelevantly brought up, that Elijah was uniquely taken up...

Sinner, what do you mean by your phrase, "repent of sin"?