Search results

Would you like me to start quote-mangling against you, as you've been doing against me, and are here threatening to continue doing against me? Too bad, Satan-seed; not gonna happen.

Here, you are admitting that you're not in this thread to respond to what others have written, but to instead carry on with yourself. Question: Why would you use the function to address your post to me, quoting something I had written, and pretend (by saying "yes") to agree with what I had...

Do you think he might actually be Tony Randall?

Without belief of what proposition? To what proposition are you referring by your phrase, "in a supreme being"? Every belief, without exception, is belief of some proposition, whether a true proposition (a truth) or a false proposition (a falsehood). Do you just mean what am I referring to by...

What do you mean by your word, "atheist"?

You've been warned. Better not continue your practice of quote-mangling.

It was your mindless reaction. Duh. LOL

I had stated: To which you responded: That's you signifying your agreement with what I had stated; that's you agreeing with the fact that, according to your vicious heresy, a new creature has been a sinner. Don't respond with a "yes" to the fact I have stated if you don't agree with the fact I...

I wrote: But you used the direct quote function in your post to flagrantly to misquote my words thus: I never write a comma immediately followed by a question mark, because that is as dumb as to separate a question mark from the last letter of a sentence by a space, and other frequent...

That's yet another idiotic, meaningless phrase, and a non-response from you.

Even things He can't do, like deny Himself? Contrary to your stupidity, God cannot do everything; and you blaspheme Him by saying He can, since, by doing so you are saying (among other things) that God can love evil, and that God can believe falsehood (like, for instance, the proposition that...

That's you saying God creates not-good things, you God-blaspheming fool.

Why no you read what wrote I, you idiot?

Name those "slave owners", and tell us in what years they were born. Name "those forced into slavery", and tell us in what years they were born.

LOL @ "perpetrating". Get a time machine if you want to force wealth out of the hands of victimizers who have long since died and to give it to their victims who have long since died. You are perpetrating hating whitey. And doing that is not a black (or any other color) thing to do; rather...

You've parroted that stupidity more than once, and it's meaningless every time, you Christ-blaspheming sinner.

What part of "the leopard cannot change his spots" and "the Ethiopian cannot change his skin" (Jeremiah 13:23) do you not get, Bible-denier?

VS According to your vicious heresy, a new creature has been a sinner. When God created Adam, He created someone who had never been a sinner. Yet, according to your heresy, when God creates the new creature spoken of by Paul in the verse you quoted, He created someone who has been a sinner...

In fact, by carrying out their desired theft/wealth-redistribution policies such as their falsely-named "reparations", they'd be making California into a slave state. But commies never are honest enough to call the victims of their predations, "slaves"...or even to call their victims, "victims".

Why do you assume they're pretending to be a woman, instead of 🍚?