Search results

If Trump is more hated than worshiped, how could he be the Antichrist? Do you deny that the beast of Revelation 13:4 is the Antichrist? And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with...

You're waiting to see whether or not you will die? And, when you die, you're going to say "Oops! It seems I have been wrong all this time I've been calling myself 'non-sinner' and 'ex-sinner'! It stands to reason I did commit sin, after all, since I did die, and since the wages of sin is...

For you to say you are not a sinner is for you to say you have never repented from sin. Only sinners can/do repent from sin. Things that are not sinners cannot/do not repent from sin.

Q. All those what who repent of sins were once sinners? A. All those sinners who repent of sins were once sinners. Since nobody but sinners repent of sin, here's what you've just admitted: Imagine that: all sinners were once sinners. No doy! And all sinners, even all sinners who repent of...

🤣 Some care more about soles than about souls, you mean?

https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/mike-pence-says-us-troops-may-have-to-fight-if-ukraine-doesnt-repel-russia-5492251?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=whatfinger&src_src=partner&src_cmp=whatfinger

What you're saying, there, is that democracy should stop being democracy.

I don't remember if I've heard that before, but that's really a great saying!

My guess is all of "his" wealth is "his" wealth by some or other socialist redistribution program.

If you weren't a God-hating fool, God-hating fools would be saying that about you, too. You shouldn't be angry at me for the fact that you have been cornered into demonstrating how worthless and indefensible your atheist stupidity, your atheismspeak, is.

If you did not agree with what I wrote, then you did not agree with what I meant to write, since what I wrote is what I meant to write. Duh.

Every thing and every person that has been X, had been X. Every thing and every person that had been X, has been X. You gain absolutely nothing by your bizarre, futile ploy of begging "had" for help against "has". It does not help you at all; it does not make your anti-logic proceedings...

@rstrats: <NO ANSWER> @rstrats: <NO ANSWER> @rstrats: <NO ANSWER> @rstrats: <NO ANSWER> You can't deal rationally with these questions, because you use your word "exists" meaninglessly. Asking you questions you can't answer about your use of certain words you choose to use? Of course...

It's not my fault that you choose to use your word, "exist", meaninglessly, and that you thus cannot respond rationally to the questions I ask you about your use of it. You've got nothing. Just think about it: your whole, worthless shtick as an atheist rests on your cognitively meaningless...

What (if anything) do you mean by your word, "exists"? When you say "X exists," are you saying that X is doing something? If so, then what are you saying X is doing? Could you answer that question sans using "exists"?

VS 1) Do you agree with what I wrote, or 2) Is what I wrote not comprehendable to you? Which is it? It ain't both.

LOL @ the stupidity of saying you will reword that which you say you are unable to comprehend. Can you comprehend this: "aehf huh tfghhioojgf"? Please reword "aehf huh tfghhioojgf" so it is comprehendable!🤣

Do what you will in the whitespace body of your posts, but remember that if I see you continuing your use of the function to misquote what I have written, I'll not hesitate to flag your fouls, to bring them to the attention of the TOL moderators.

Here is what I wrote, and what you have once again told me you agree with: You "used better English" to do what, exactly?

Yet you also contradict it by saying: Why do you so hate logic?