Search results

Lol.

This is all we have to go on. “Ifs” have no place in a courtroom. Verdict, please.

“Brutal” isn’t required for rape—only nonconsent, according to the posts we’ve seen here. Are we changing the focus to include brutality? I know many have no need for authority in any of this discussion, but let’s consult a dictionary: Miriam Webster’s: : unlawful sexual activity and usually...

All we know is that she wasn't willing on Tuesday--no one ever said it had to be brutal--just unwanted.

Never said it did. But even if it happens, it's not rape. Consider this scenario. A married couple has sex on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. Afterward, the wife complains to a friend about Tuesday's tryst, which friend gets incensed about the husband forcing himself on her, and convinces her...

And Clete does a decent job, much of the time, though he usually errs when he agrees with you. He didn't quote much scripture while he was agreeing with you, so it's pretty much just his opinion, too.

Do you? Try it here: Www.blb.org Or use this more direct link: https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/1co/7/5/s_1069005

S Oh good. Then Clete probably gave you some bible verses you can pass on to me, right?

If I can merely make a statement without backing it up with some authoritative source, I can say anything I want, and nobody can convince me otherwise. I am a god. I define reality. Perhaps if Brain could show that he is the ultimate biblical authority, such that Paul has to check in with him...

My name is Webster. I get to define words however I like.

Brain is not a brain. Fact. Hey this stuff grows on you. There's all kinds of things I can unilaterally decide. A man is really a woman if he believes it hard enough. See? A rapist is a rapist if I decide he is. Or not if I decide he's not. It's purely my opinion against yours, and I just have...

Nope. You go cry in a glass of milk. You've shown us nothing except your feeble opinion.

Yet you haven't shown anything that proves you're correct. It's all in your noggin. Paul doesn't help you, as you've shown by not even attempting to quote him.

Nope.

Brain would be correct if he removed that third word.

Those last 3 words are the whole point of my post. And the reason they are necessary is because of both the punishment for rape, and the evidentiary requirements. Even the liberals in this discussion, at least most of them, recognize the heinousness of the crime of rape and we're willing to...

If your source is merely your own brain, Brain, then you have nothing to hold over anyone else. There can be all kinds of "facts" dancing around in there. I've already explained that there can be abuse, including physical harm perpetrated by a husband on his wife. But it isn't rape.

Nope. All I've got is the definition and etymology of the word. What do you have, pure opinion with a touch of ad hominem?

Said the man who asked a bunch of questions without answering any. Or because I hope you'll think through your position better? Guess that's too much to ask for. Yes. "Christians" are little Christs. There are some folks that claim Christ without being his, which could skew your perception of...

👍 It didn't seem to happen based on baptism (Acts 19:6 (KJV) And when Paul had laid [his] hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.), and it seems not to have happened every time. (1 Corinthians 12:30 (KJV) Have all the gifts of healing? do all...