Search results

Perhaps you're not cooking on all four burners? Post #539 Looks like @JudgeRightly's post to me.🤷‍♂️

Seeing how addicted @Arthur Brain is to appealing to meaningless, fake distinctions, I'd not be surprised to see that leftard weasel, if he felt it would somehow be to his advantage, saying "I'm centre left, not center left!"

What's the difference between "hardly left wing" and "centre left"? Waters is whatever it's convenient for @Arthur Brain for Waters to be.

What you're calling "reasoning". Sure. Tell me what (if anything) you meant when you said that certain people ...if you did not mean they never read the word "the".

You claimed: I just gave you the word, "the", as an example of a word she wrote which proves that what you claimed is false. What's the matter?

Why not? He's read every book from every garage sale.

Among others, she wrote the word "the", so, on the contrary, the vast majority of the English-literate world has, in fact, read at least one word she wrote.

You're in no debt to me. Honestly, I'm kinda lost as to what's going on, here; but just realize that I have no perception that you have in any way wronged me. What? Gambling? Lying? Being melodramatic on TOL? No harm done. Don't beat yourself up.

Well, even if you stop being an idiot, you still might be attacked; but at least in that case you would no longer be able to be attacked as an idiot.

That sort of thinking is so short-sighted and self-defeating. If one must give away everything he/she owns in order to be obedient to Jesus' command to love our neighbor as ourselves, then what of the person(s) to whom it must be given? I mean, what's the recipient (the new owner) supposed to...

That's sordid!

That is possible thanks to computer technology. And remember, as the Darwinists tell us, among other things, we would never have computer technology if it weren't for Darwinism.🤣

My best guess is that @Jaz is under some delusion so as to imagine that, by using the "Ignore" function on my posts, he/she has prevented me from posting in this thread: But surely he/she couldn't be that dumb, if Los Alamos National Laboratory employed him/her "as their Investigations manager":

What is that supposed to mean?

What are you even talking about? Your words there do not even resemble a description of anything I wonder about. One thing I wonder about is why you keep getting onto TOL and making posts, seeing as you are constantly, hysterically complaining that you are being attacked.

Weird. And did you "stop a conversation"? Of what did your "stopping a conversation" consist?

Why bother even making a post like that, since it's also obvious that we'll go our own ways?

I never called what you said "a rhetorical statement". What do you mean by calling what you said "a rhetorical statement"? You said: How is your telling us that you'd be willing to commit the sin of gambling rhetorical? LOL, nah. Saying things like that, you're starting to remind me a...

I do? What I wonder is what counts as "staying on" this forum "very long".

No. By your behavior of casually making light of it, you show that you don't take it seriously that gambling is sinful.