Search results

That's obviously false, as even you know. You clearly did not repeat what God wrote. Again, what God wrote: the gathering together of the waters called he Seas VS What you wrote: What God wrote is clearly not what you wrote.

Why do you choose to capitalize the initial L of your phrase "the Lord God", and choose to not capitalize the initial L of your phrase "the lord Jesus Christ"? If you had a quarter -- a 25¢ piece -- in each of your hands, would you consider it reasonable to write "I have two quarters; one is...

Did someone say the first day was "a collection of individual days or first days"? No. So, what's your "point"? Did someone say God took a collection of ribs? No. So, what's your "point"? Did someone say Adam was left rib-less? No. So, what's your "point"?

That's false. The gathering together of the waters spoken of in Genesis 1:9-10 is Seas, not one place. 9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. 10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering...

1) God is the only true God. 2) The Father is God, and thus, 3) the Father is the only true God. 4) The Son is God, and thus, 5) the Son is the only true God. Yet, 6) the Father is not the Son; and 7) the Son is not the Father. 1) [Water] is [the only true water]. 2) [The Pacific Ocean] is...

Ruth 4:18-22 Now these are the generations of Pharez: Pharez begat Hezron, And Hezron begat Ram, and Ram begat Amminadab, And Amminadab begat Nahshon, and Nahshon begat Salmon, And Salmon begat Boaz, and Boaz begat Obed, And Obed begat Jesse, and Jesse begat David.

Not than you, no.

@Gary K: <NO ANSWER> My recommendation is that you should seek mental help, as soon as possible. No, you should definitely only call everyone honest, all the time, every time they say something, and simply because they say something. No, never deny anything anyone says, because it is mean and...

So what?

The words I said which seem to have triggered you to say this were "liar", "fool", and "God-hater". Of course, if you are calling those words "nasty names", you've given no explanation as to why you do so. But, surely no reasonable person would wish to lean too heavily on claiming that those...

Whoops! So, according to you, you don't know what you claim; according to you, you don't know that people you have talked to believe they are sinless, but you nevertheless claim they do.

I don't know what (if anything) you mean by "read my heart". Can you please describe exactly it would be to "read [one's] heart"?

Basically, it sounds like you are saying, there, that success is the sole earthly judge of right and wrong. "It's hardy [sic] taken off" sounds like "it's not popularly credited" sounds like "it's not successful at garnering popular credit". So what if belief of a proposition has "hardy [sic]...

What's your "point"? Where did @Gary K say anything about anyone being possessed? Correct answer: He didn't.

What did you mean, then, by "it's hardy [sic] taken off", if not that "it" is not popularly credited? Were you talking about the Spruce Goose or something?

Because you say so? False. In other words, even you know you cannot respond rationally against the fact that Hitler and the Nazis are your fellow leftards.

Implied what?

Hey, you can't read @Gary K's heart to know whether or not his calling you "duped" is patronizing!

You mean the graffiti?