Search results

You can't fight gas with gas.

My guess would be that your "past" experience you are referring to is likely some sort of traumatic head injury or narcotics abuse. If you ever want to post something other than gibberish like what you've just written, I recommend it would be a step in the right direction for you to outsource...

In this passage, where does Paul say anything about keeping any law? Nowhere.

I suppose that since you're obviously just trying to have an out-loud conversation with yourself, it may well get on your nerves to hear others saying things. But must you attack others by calling their comments "useless"?

@Jaz: <NO ANSWER>

That's you admitting you cannot answer the questions I asked you about your own raving. So? You should stop attacking people, then, you hypocrite. (And, if you think to respond to this by saying, "Who am I attacking?" I'll just play your own game against you by saying, "You know what I'm...

Who has attacked you? Of what did the attacks consist? Can you describe them? Are you OK now?

What can I do about that? I can't fix your mind. To what "same thing" are you referring? How has what varied? What are you referring to by your pronoun, "that"? Who is attacking new posters? What (if anything) do you mean by that? What exactly would it be for "this forum" "to grow"? Oh...

"Others"? Is this you, or is this "others": ?

You said the Gospels are not eyewitness accounts: The stories you are telling us about the Gospels agree not together.

Actually, you have not answered the question I asked you, and you just want me to play along at make-believe with you in saying that you have.

I doubt he believes he is sinless. But he definitely clings to telling us that he believes he is sinless.

Is this what you mean when you say that the author of Matthew is "anonymous": ?

Be honest, @Jaz: if, in Matthew, you could read the words, "I, Matthew, wrote this Gospel," you would still be sitting there claiming that Matthew did not write it. Yet, you are claiming the name of the writer of Matthew is "Nicodemus", a name that does not even once occur therein, let alone we...

Maybe he got it from this guy: (Image courtesy of Fawkes News)

Lacks? You mean the have-nots?😁 Please don't take it personally, my pointing out some of your typos. I don't consider them consequential, or as reflecting negatively against your intelligence. It's just that sometimes I happen to notice a typo that, for some reason or another, kind of amuses...

Tell it to someone who doesn't consider you to be a vicious liar. Nobody says you have, Nazi. You say that to people all the time. What do you get out of doing that? You do know that nobody imagines that you have any power or authority over what they do, right? You saying that just shows...

In other words: "I, @Arthur Brain, have spoken! Agree with me!😤" Because you are Nazis. Duh.

Are you not asking me two questions, rather than just one? 1. "Are you telling me that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John didn't write the Gospels?" Answer: No, I'm not telling you that. 2. "Are you telling me that God wrote the Gospels?" Answer: Yes, I am telling you that. Do you disagree? Which...

False. Since all marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman, you've just handed us an oxymoron: Why do you say that a man and a woman are two people of the same sex? @Arthur Brain, you are too much addicted to funny talk.