Search results

Beep Beep !!!

We have different Gods. Mine said..."He who endures till the end shall be saved." (Matt 10:22) James follows it up with..."Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him." (James 1:12) Paul...

I would need the definition of "Israel". Is it a nation? A people?, The set apart people of God? A religion? If anything, the unbelieving Israelites separated themselves from the believing Israelites and we Gentile faithful were grafted on to the faithful "Branch". All the faithful are one Body...

Jesus died for all of mankind. But most are not willing to pay the cost to take advantage of the offer. Who do you suppose Jesus says "NO" to when they ask Him for forgiveness?

Trying to do, but you work from a false premise. That is your opinion. Don't start lying. What I conceded was ..."Changing one's mind does not make one incapable of sinning." Don't stray from the truth. We differ in out opinions. Why would they be 25% capable but not 100% capable? Besides the...

Agreed I don't know anything about MSM or its journalists. I don't recall ever saying something like that. I thank God for that, as I left the "human" in the dust many years ago. I now walk in and after the Spirit,...thanks be to God. By describing an entity as "wing" you automatically...

We are in a "republic".

Do you feel that a "winger" CAN present the truth? The bias inherent in the "wing" concept makes it doubtful.

I am glad we don't "all" have to be sinners anymore, thanks to the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ.

If it is true, the "wingers" will diverge from it. The truth is in the middle.

Afraid...nah. Uninterested in the "take" of the unclean is more like it. BTW, it was you who called your cited magazine(?) Salon a "winger".

It is quite silly to think we can lose our salvation because we refuse to tell lies or kill people for the fun of it. Paul was talking about the "works" of circumcision, primarily, and to a lesser extent dietary rules, when he wrote against works. Your false doctrine deprives men of repenting...

Thanks anyway, but I'm not interested in anything by any "winger".

You can lead a horse to water but...oh never mind.

That I can agree with. A hundred and fifty dollars?

Though it is an intriguing concept, coming from such an avid espouser of false information as yourself, it doesn't ring true. Boy who cried wolf...you know?

Is that how they fight cancer in Russia?

Put it to the test. Our opinions differ. You are right. But if you turn from sin you don't go back to it. If one does go back, it wasn't a repentance from sin. He was as you put it "glad" because the Corinthians were separating themselves along the lines of who had baptized them with water...

But they are. Your scope is too narrowminded. On the other hand, if one changes their minds about their love for sin, they won;\'t ever sin again. Supra. Where? If he thought it unnecessary, why did he baptize the twelve at Ephesus, the Thyatiran jailer, or those at Corinth? Our opinions differ.

My feelings are backed up with facts. Repentance from sin is turning from sin permanently. Look up "repent" in the dictionary. Water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins. (Acts 2:38, Acts 10:47, Acts 19:1-5, Acts 22:16) It is the description I just gave, so you are...