Search results

We collapsed so hard we sprang back into order again.

This thread is in Enyart's honor. It's been nothing but respectful and honorable toward him, his memory, and theological legacy. Sure. And who judges whether that's been done or not? Is the judgment objective and justified? How do we know? who judges that? I haven't found any evidence...

I've been using a sober register this whole thread, if not entirely serious or somber—sober. Everybody believes that their system of doctrine is based on the Bible, and was founded by God and is documented by the Apostle Paul in the Bible, and is simply the correct understanding of God's Word...

It was just a very careful building out of all the vocabulary that the English language has available to talk about a system of doctrine, and a method, of reading and interpreting Scripture. Like I said this thread is in Enyart's honor. MAD wasn't a thing until he generated it as a system of...

As I said, I'm curious. I'm not an Enyartist, but I want to study it more, to steel man it, to be a better Enyartologist (and Enyartianologist, to study Enyart's Enyartian method of reading and interpreting Scripture). And like I also said, I think Enyart deserves to have his name on the...

Speaking of The Plot, @Clete even just recently said here on TOL that he converted to Enyartism through reading it. But afaik @Nick M came to Enyartism independently through his own instictive Enyartian reading of the Scripture. afaik Saint @john w the great also arrived at Enyartism...

I just have 50-100 books in front of The Plot that I'd also like to read. I by no means have written off reading The Plot. I am curious to read it, I just haven't yet. The purpose of this thread is to steel man Enyartism. What you're referring to is back when I knew it as Mid-Acts...

We've already collapsed—I'm just glad to still be alive! Phew, that was a close one!!!

I'm familiar. Enyartists here however, do not identify as either Bullingerists or Hyper-Dispensationalists, and from my reading of them (and I could be wrong), they take those terms to be pejorative, and that's why they don't identify as either. 'Enyartism' is offered respectfully about them...

First things first, Mid-Acts Dispensationalism (or MAD), Acts 9 Dispensationalism, or simply Acts 9erism, is Enyartism. Edit: As expected, JR and RD provided some needed clarifications to the thread. Enyartism is not only MAD, but is also Open Theism. Post 36.

Named for the late Pastor Bob Enyart of happy memory, who originated, created, authored and developed it. It is a system of doctrine developed with the Enyartian method, also originated by Enyart. Anything (whatsoever) that originates from Enyart is Enyartic, and everything all together which...

lol yes. But that is basically an inefficient 5.56 NATO. The extra charge isn't going to matter more than just having a longer barrel. The longer the barrel, the higher the velocity of the bullet.

And President Trump started this campaign for Canada the exact right way strategically. You've got to broach the subject somehow, you might as well make it memorable, because you don't want there to be any mistake at all on either side about what he means. He means Canada 51st state. We all...

I addressed this right in my post. I addressed it in an extremely detailed way, if we're to compare it with your slop. Meaning I'm not bragging, I'm saying you post slop.

But you do grant we have them as children anyway. Seemed like maybe Doser was questioning that is all.

What's not to believe in? $$ Mt 18:10 Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven. If we have angels as children, why wouldn't we have them when we're all growed up?

Take heart. Surely even the most avowedly anti-Christian, atheist secularists in your family still hold to many distinctive and signature Christian morals. They believe in justice, due process of law, separation of powers, universal human rights and equality, and other things that come only...

I propose that the following is the plain reading of Romans 6 re sinning. Ro 6:1-2 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? iow no. Don't “ continue in sin ”. Ro 6:4 ... we ... should...

That's true. People forget the same group who did September 11 in the US did October 7 in Israel. Houthi, Hamas, Al Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, they're all cut outta the same cloth, just different patches, it's all Islamism; they're Islamists. They want to spread their form of government which...

How do you know that? This is interesting. (And @Right Divider since you 'liked' JR's post why don't you answer too. How do you know that Eastern Orthodox are far closer to Biblically grounded than Roman Catholic?)