I have listened to Bob Enyart's The Plot series & I am reading the book.

He settles a bunch of doctrinal debates like:

are believers under the law?

is baptism necessary ?

does salvation by faith require works ?

can believers lose their salvation ?

must believers keep the sabbath ?

is the rapture before the tribulation ?

is there a rapture ?

the post I have read against Mid Acts Disp have not even dented this doctrine nor can they settle these debates once and for all like The Plot has for me.

I keep waiting for some one to prove it wrong but mostly

I get the fact that people don't understand "The Plot"

"The Plot" \ Mid Acts Disp makes exegesis simple.

the question is :

can you show how your exegesis is correct

and that Mid Acts Disp exegesis is wrong ?

He settles a bunch of doctrinal debates like:

are believers under the law?

is baptism necessary ?

does salvation by faith require works ?

can believers lose their salvation ?

must believers keep the sabbath ?

is the rapture before the tribulation ?

is there a rapture ?

the post I have read against Mid Acts Disp have not even dented this doctrine nor can they settle these debates once and for all like The Plot has for me.

I keep waiting for some one to prove it wrong but mostly

I get the fact that people don't understand "The Plot"

"The Plot" \ Mid Acts Disp makes exegesis simple.

the question is :

can you show how your exegesis is correct

and that Mid Acts Disp exegesis is wrong ?

## Comment