I have listened to Bob Enyart's The Plot series & I am reading the book.
He settles a bunch of doctrinal debates like:
are believers under the law?
is baptism necessary ?
does salvation by faith require works ?
can believers lose their salvation ?
must believers keep the sabbath ?
is the rapture before the tribulation ?
is there a rapture ?
the post I have read against Mid Acts Disp have not even dented this doctrine nor can they settle these debates once and for all like The Plot has for me.
I keep waiting for some one to prove it wrong but mostly
I get the fact that people don't understand "The Plot"

"The Plot" \ Mid Acts Disp makes exegesis simple.
the question is :
can you show how your exegesis is correct
and that Mid Acts Disp exegesis is wrong ?
He settles a bunch of doctrinal debates like:
are believers under the law?
is baptism necessary ?
does salvation by faith require works ?
can believers lose their salvation ?
must believers keep the sabbath ?
is the rapture before the tribulation ?
is there a rapture ?
the post I have read against Mid Acts Disp have not even dented this doctrine nor can they settle these debates once and for all like The Plot has for me.
I keep waiting for some one to prove it wrong but mostly
I get the fact that people don't understand "The Plot"

"The Plot" \ Mid Acts Disp makes exegesis simple.
the question is :
can you show how your exegesis is correct
and that Mid Acts Disp exegesis is wrong ?
Comment