Sorry but thats just not true, just because zeke has posted in our Urantia thread doesnt make him a UB reader, let alone an enthusiast in that particular revelation, and moreso does not make him a 'loon', anymore than your subscribing and believing in traditional Christian pop-theology makes you a 'bible goon',...but perhaps that could be debated.
At least he challenges and questions what is handed down to man in any book, and sees that much of the 'narrative' may be fictional, contrived or merely parables containing deeper meanings and metaphors, and are not necessarily meant to be taking 'literally', neither be historically true per se,....but what matters is a deeper truth or revelation behind the images and symbols. - all is interpreted/translated subjectively anyways. All points of view are subject to change, with more or better information, insight or progressive revelation.
On that note, my former commentary holds, since no matter how hard you try or what utility of dogma or evolved doctrine deemed 'orthodox' is employed,
you still cant put 'God' in a 'box'.
So, you cannot hold ONLY ONE book or a collection of books (a 'bible' of any kind) as being sanctioned or inspired by God, while every other religious book, spiritual writing that has risen in the past ages and will rise in the future is not or could not be inspired by 'God', for to assume such is maniacal, irrational and insane. You could not contain, restrict or limit the infinite Spirit or wisdom of Deity if you tried, since a finite mind cannot prohibit or limit the
omnipresence of infinite intelligence.......EVER.
--------------
