Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4

[alwight]

Do you really think that keeping quiet about underage sex is a good way to prevent it going on, and perhaps also, in what passes for your mind, underage pregnancies will swiftly become a thing of the past?

Sexual deviants like proud and unrepentant homosexual Peter Tatchell (and the LGBTQueer movement that he represents) shouldn't be allowed to be anywhere near children, let alone teaching them about the sex and moral values that go along with it.

We've seen the disease, misery and death that comes with the modern day sexual anarchy movement (HIV AIDS, syphilis, gonorrhea, drug and alcohol abuse, suicide and premature death amongst homosexuals; abortion, fatherless homes and crime that comes from male-female out of wedlock sex).

Christian doctrine needs to replace your secular humanist doctrine as it's failed miserably.

I can't say I noticed any response to my question in all this blathering nonsense. :idunno:

But you [aCW] think that keeping quiet and not informing teenagers about sexual activity and the risks involved would be a good thing, right?

Note how homosexual activist Peter Tatchell says that teenagers (13-19 years old) have "sexual rights". Where did these supposed "rights" come from?

Why would we have to be given our own basic human rights to do with our own bodies aCW?
Beyond that I see nothing particularly wrong with proper sex education, having a legal age of responsibility and in parents having ultimate rights over their non-adult offspring.

However I notice that some interfering busy-bodies seem to think that it's their God given right to take away the individual rights of all others as and when they deem fit, namely if they personally disapprove, or happen think that their God does.

Care to answer both my question now?

Again: Christian doctrine showing that homosexuality is always wrong (plus educating youth about the disease, misery and death that comes with it and showing that there is a way out of the homosexuality) and that sex between a male and a female should be only in the confines of marriage (showing what happens when out of wedlock sex occurs...pregnancy, abortions, broken relationships, etc.) needs to be promoted.

Then I have no problem with Christians doing what they preach, my problem is when they want to impose it across society, Christian or otherwise.
Tatchell is apparently offering his own secular opinion albeit from his gay perspective, good for him, if Christians or I don't like it then we don't have to go along with it.

Up to this point I don't see any great problem with proper sex education from an early age, you're just tilting at windmills aCW.

Groom em young ey Al? Stealing the innocence from children is a mainstay of the LGBTQueer movement, as seen in their indoctrination of them at 'gay' pride parades, etc. (exposing them to nudity and all kinds of depraved acts).

I see, so you would advocate keeping sex secret, hidden and away from young people until when the time comes be all surprised when they do the all the wrong things?
That doesn't seem very smart to me aCW.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Sexual deviants like proud and unrepentant homosexual Peter Tatchell (and the LGBTQueer movement that he represents) shouldn't be allowed to be anywhere near children, let alone teaching them about the sex and moral values that go along with it.

We've seen the disease, misery and death that comes with the modern day sexual anarchy movement (HIV AIDS, syphilis, gonorrhea, drug and alcohol abuse, suicide and premature death amongst homosexuals; abortion, fatherless homes and crime that comes from male-female out of wedlock sex).

Christian doctrine needs to replace your secular humanist doctrine as it's failed miserably.

I can't say I noticed any response to my question in all this blathering nonsense.

Perverts and abortionists belong in jail, not educating and making legislation that effects innocent children.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Note how homosexual activist Peter Tatchell says that teenagers (13-19 years old) have "sexual rights". Where did these supposed "rights" come from?

Why would we have to be given our own basic human rights to do with our own bodies aCW?

Age of consent laws (the ones that homosexual activist Peter Tatchell would like to lower to the age of 14) says that people under a certain age don't have the "right" to do with their bodies as they please, do you disagree with age of consent laws Al?

Beyond that I see nothing particularly wrong with proper sex education,

(In Al's world "proper" means sexual deviants teaching young children about Heather having two mommies).

having a legal age of responsibility and in parents having ultimate rights over their non-adult offspring.

We've seen what kind of "ultimate rights" parents have over their non-adult offspring in today's society.

In certain US States parents can't seek therapy for their sexually confused child. Parents can't tell their child not to use contraception or have an abortion. Parents can't tell their gender confused child not to get a sex change,
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4425884&postcount=223

all because of abortion/homosexual activism which wouldn't happen if abortion and homosexuality were illegal.

However I notice that some interfering busy-bodies seem to think that it's their God given right to take away the individual rights of all others as and when they deem fit, namely if they personally disapprove, or happen think that their God does.
Care to answer both my question now?

Perversion isn't a right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Again: Christian doctrine showing that homosexuality is always wrong (plus educating youth about the disease, misery and death that comes with it and showing that there is a way out of the homosexuality) and that sex between a male and a female should be only in the confines of marriage (showing what happens when out of wedlock sex occurs...pregnancy, abortions, broken relationships, etc.) needs to be promoted.

Then I have no problem with Christians doing what they preach, my problem is when they want to impose it across society, Christian or otherwise.
Tatchell is apparently offering his own secular opinion albeit from his gay perspective, good for him, if Christians or I don't like it then we don't have to go along with it.

Be real Al, legislation effects all of society.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior .
Groom em young ey Al? Stealing the innocence from children is a mainstay of the LGBTQueer movement, as seen in their indoctrination of them at 'gay' pride parades, etc. (exposing them to nudity and all kinds of depraved acts).

I see, so you would advocate keeping sex secret, hidden and away from young people until when the time comes be all surprised when they do the all the wrong things?
That doesn't seem very smart to me aCW.

Sex is a beautiful thing in the confines of marriage. At a certain age children need to have that "birds and the bees talk", but not by people and a movement who are sexual deviants.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I have bad news for you people who were planning on crossing dressing as a very famous morally and gender confused person for Halloween:

Hollywood Retail Folds to LGBT Pressure and Pulls Caitlyn Jenner Costume

Aug. 26, 2015

Halloween retailer Spirit Halloween, which previously defended its decision to sell a costume inspired by Bruce Jenner’s gender transition, caved to pressure from LGBT groups, and pulled the costume from its website Wednesday.

The “Call Me Caitlyn Unisex Adult Costume,” which satirizes the former Olympian’s likeness, as seen on the cover of the July issue of Vanity Fair, sparked outrage online Tuesday, with Twitter users and LGBT advocates describing it as “transphobic.”

Some of those upset by the costume also made violent threats
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollyw...tyln-jenner-halloween-costume-sparks-outrage/

towards anyone planning on going as the transgender TV star...

Read more: http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollyw...o-lgbt-pressure-pulls-caityln-jenner-costume/

Violent threats? Don't go mocking the "T" in the LGBTQ acronym or else.

 

[alwight]

I can't say I noticed any response to my question in all this blathering nonsense.

Perverts and abortionists belong in jail, not educating and making legislation that effects innocent children.

Fortunately those you condemn as "perverts" aCW aren't automatically adopted in civil law or by more reasonable people as that. Why "abortionists" gets an outing here isn't too clear to me, red herring perhaps?

Why would we have to be given our own basic human rights to do with our own bodies aCW?

Age of consent laws (the ones that homosexual activist Peter Tatchell would like to lower to the age of 14) says that people under a certain age don't have the "right" to do with their bodies as they please, do you disagree with age of consent laws Al?

I think civil society and parents have a right to impose what they consider reasonable standards too, but self-righteous bigots and self-appointed spokesmen of gods do not.

Beyond that I see nothing particularly wrong with proper sex education,

(In Al's world "proper" means sexual deviants teaching young children about Heather having two mommies).

Nothing like a spot of well poisoning from our not too honest broker here I see.

having a legal age of responsibility and in parents having ultimate rights over their non-adult offspring.

We've seen what kind of "ultimate rights" parents have over their non-adult offspring in today's society.

In certain US States parents can't seek therapy for their sexually confused child. Parents can't tell their child not to use contraception or have an abortion. Parents can't tell their gender confused child not to get a sex change,
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4425884&postcount=223
all because of abortion/homosexual activism which wouldn't happen if abortion and homosexuality were illegal.

So it'll mean less underage pregnancies, STDs and where hopefully rape victims are not cruelly forced into gestating a rapist's foetus. :up:

However I notice that some interfering busy-bodies seem to think that it's their God given right to take away the individual rights of all others as and when they deem fit, namely if they personally disapprove, or happen think that their God does.
Care to answer both my question now?

Perversion isn't a right.

It isn't perversion just because you say it is aCW

Then I have no problem with Christians doing what they preach, my problem is when they want to impose it across society, Christian or otherwise.
Tatchell is apparently offering his own secular opinion albeit from his gay perspective, good for him, if Christians or I don't like it then we don't have to go along with it.

Be real Al, legislation effects all of society.

Happily that usually means that extremist nutters don't get to dictate to the rest of us in a reasonable democracy.

I see, so you would advocate keeping sex secret, hidden and away from young people until when the time comes be all surprised when they do the all the wrong things?
That doesn't seem very smart to me aCW.

Sex is a beautiful thing in the confines of marriage. At a certain age children need to have that "birds and the bees talk", but not by people and a movement who are sexual deviants.

Sex is a fundamental part of life aCW, giraffes and hyenas do it, don't get all mushy here, it really doesn't suit you. After all, you want these supposed "deviants" all criminalised only because of their sexual orientation not because they actually are deviant.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

More violence from the "culture of death" :

Inside Virginia shooter Bryce Williams' home: Unwashed sex toys, gay porn, cat faeces and pictures of himself reporting

August 27, 2015

Police raided the flat yesterday after the former TV news reporter murdered reporter Alison Parker, 24, and cameraman Adam Ward, 27, live on TV.

Police who raided killer gunman Bryce Williams’ home after he murdered two journalists live on air found gay porn, unwashed sex toys and cat faeces inside.

Exclusive pictures obtained by the Mirror show the inside of the 41-year-old’s third-floor apartment...

Inside they [the police] found his computer, which our pictures show they later took the hard drive from.

A source said the police found “many” unwashed sex toys in the flat as well as gay porn.

Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/inside-virginia-shooter-bryce-williams-6329277

But wait, there's more! Williams was a victim of racism and homophobia!

Black, Gay Reporter Murders Straight, White Journalists — Media Blame the Gun

In a 23-page rambling letter sent to ABC News, Williams wrote that the Charleston church shooting in June should have provoked a race war: “Why did I do it? I put a deposit for a gun on 6/19/15. The Church shooting in Charleston happened on 6/17/15…What sent me over the top was the church shooting…You want a race war (deleted)? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE …(deleted)!!!” According to ABC News, he claimed he had “suffered racial discrimination, sexual harassment and bullying at work,” that he had “been attacked by black men and white females, and that he had been "attacked for being a gay black man."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...raight-white-journalists-media-blame-the-gun/

 

[Arthur Brain]

Have you ever thought of going for a walk in the country or something aCW? Ya know, like somewhere away from the internet, might do you good...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Have you ever thought of going for a walk in the country or something aCW? Ya know, like somewhere away from the internet, might do you good...

How about I take a nice walk after you tell us what laws, safe guards and legal precedents are protecting children?

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

I'm interested in these

law, safeguards and legal precedent

that you talked about in your previous post that are allegedly protecting children.

Which laws are those?

What safeguards and legal precedents are being used today by society to make certain that children aren't indoctrinated, groomed and physically molested by the sexual deviants of the LGBTQueer/sexual anarchist movement?
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4422475&postcount=168

 

[TracerBullet]

What safeguards and legal precedents are being used today by society to make certain that children aren't indoctrinated, groomed and physically molested by the sexual deviants of the LGBTQueer/sexual anarchist movement?

that safeguard would be reality

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Besides being a top notch debater:

Ted Cruz is a brilliant strategist.

Ted Cruz Targets Over 100,000 Pastors as he Launches New Church-based Campaign Push

August 24, 2015

Sen. Ted Cruz, who has assiduously courted evangelicals throughout his presidential run, will take a lead role in the launch this week of an ambitious 50-state campaign to end taxpayer support for Planned Parenthood — a move that is likely to give the GOP candidate a major primary-season boost in the fierce battle for social-conservative and evangelical voters.

More than 100,000 pastors received e-mail invitations over the weekend to participate in conference calls with Cruz on Tuesday in which they will learn details of the plan to mobilize churchgoers in every congressional district beginning Aug. 30. The requests were sent on the heels of the Texas Republican’s “Rally for Religious Liberty,” which drew 2,500 people to a Des Moines ballroom Friday.

“The recent exposure of Planned Parenthood’s barbaric practices . . . has brought about a pressing need to end taxpayer support of this institution,” Cruz said in the e-mail call to action distributed by the American Renewal Project, an organization of conservative pastors.

The push comes as Cruz seeks to grab a decisive edge in a crowded primary-within-a-primary, with half a dozen GOP contenders battling for what he has referred to as “the evangelical bracket.”

Roughly 1 in 4 voters have identified themselves as evangelical in exit polls from the 2004 campaign on. In key Republican contests such as Iowa, and in some of the Southern states that Cruz has said are critical to his run, that figure was higher during the last presidential campaign — nearly 50 percent.

Read more: https://bcnn1wp.wordpress.com/2015/...s-he-launches-new-church-based-campaign-push/

I read where a guy referred to Evangelical Christians as "Evan-jellyfish" (I roared with laughter).

It's time that "Evan-jellyfish" grow a spine, get involved in the political system and support Ted Cruz for President of the United States!

 

[annabenedetti]

Besides being a top notch debater:

Ted Cruz is a brilliant strategist.

Ted Cruz Targets Over 100,000 Pastors as he Launches New Church-based Campaign Push

August 24, 2015

Sen. Ted Cruz, who has assiduously courted evangelicals throughout his presidential run, will take a lead role in the launch this week of an ambitious 50-state campaign to end taxpayer support for Planned Parenthood — a move that is likely to give the GOP candidate a major primary-season boost in the fierce battle for social-conservative and evangelical voters.

More than 100,000 pastors received e-mail invitations over the weekend to participate in conference calls with Cruz on Tuesday in which they will learn details of the plan to mobilize churchgoers in every congressional district beginning Aug. 30. The requests were sent on the heels of the Texas Republican’s “Rally for Religious Liberty,” which drew 2,500 people to a Des Moines ballroom Friday.

Bad Religion by Ross Douthat

p270:

"This trend has helped ratify a shift we examined in earlier chapters: the steady conflation of religious belief and partisan politics, to the detriment of both. As the two political coalitions have become theological worlds unto themselves, messianic and apocalyptic in equal measure, it’s become harder and harder for Christians to find a place to stand on public issues that isn’t straightforwardly partisan. The more that politics becomes the landscape of good versus evil, real Americans versus fascists or socialist, liberty versus tyranny, the greater the pressure to simply conform your theology to ideology. Whether they’re Protestant or Catholic, lukewarm or zealous, believers inevitably find themselves pressured to “join the side they’re on,” instead of trying to do justice to the inevitable complexities of political life in the City of Man."




So really, what it comes down to is that Cruz wants to mobilize Christian evangelicals towards helping him achieve his political goals by tapping into their deepest religion-based apocalyptic fears. Onward Christian soldiers, vote for Cruz!

 

[aCultureWarrior]

p270:

"This trend has helped ratify a shift we examined in earlier chapters: the steady conflation of religious belief and partisan politics, to the detriment of both. As the two political coalitions have become theological worlds unto themselves, messianic and apocalyptic in equal measure, it’s become harder and harder for Christians to find a place to stand on public issues that isn’t straightforwardly partisan."

As followers of Christ, aren't Christians supposed to be partisan when it comes to electing God-fearing legislators and enacting righteous (Godly) legislation?

"The more that politics becomes the landscape of good versus evil, real Americans versus fascists or socialist, liberty versus tyranny, the greater the pressure to simply conform your theology to ideology. Whether they’re Protestant or Catholic, lukewarm or zealous, believers inevitably find themselves pressured to “join the side they’re on,” instead of trying to do justice to the inevitable complexities of political life in the City of Man."

Again: as followers of Christ shouldn't Christians take it upon themselves (they shouldn't have to be pressured to do what's right), to pressure legislators to defund an organization that is dismembering unborn babies and selling their body parts to the highest bidder (murdering the unborn: "evil"), and to support legislation that allows Christians to deny service to sexually confused people who mock God's institution of marriage? (religious liberty..."good").

If godly men should stay out of politics, God is the biggest offender

"The church of Jesus Christ is intended by God to be the conscience of America.

To be sure, the church is not called to run America, since we are not a theocracy but a democratic republic. If folks want a theocracy, in which clergy run the politics of a nation, then Muslim nations are the place for you.

But the church is called to be a clarion voice in the public square, calling public officials as well as the public itself back to the abiding moral principles of the laws of nature and nature's God.

Public officials are servants of God, according to Romans 13, whether they know it or not, and it is the job of the servants of God who fill our pulpits to faithfully remind public officials of their accountability to God and His truth..."

Read more: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/150416

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I was passing by a television and caught part of a news conference where Donald Trump was talking about the US-Iran nuclear deal and he said something nice about Ted Cruz (which drew a pretty good applause from the audience).

Cruz is one of few if not the only Republican Presidential candidate that hasn't bad mouthed Donald Trump....which got me to thinking (someone beat me to it).

Are We About to Witness a Cruz/Trump 2016 Ticket?

July 18, 2015

Very little is currently known about Wednesday’s hush-hush meeting between presidential candidates Ted Cruz and Donald Trump, leaving many to wonder if the pair is seeking to team up for a 2016 run. With both candidates remaining close-lipped on the details of the meeting while making it publicly known that they do share a mutual respect for each other, naturally the window of thoughts begin to open...

Read more: http://libertynews.com/2015/07/are-we-about-to-witness-a-cruztrump-2016-ticket/

A Ted Cruz/Donald Trump or Donald Trump/Ted Cruz ticket? Now that's something that I can get excited about! (two outsiders taking over WA DC).

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I just added a couple of articles to the pedophile/pederasty section of the index showing how pedophiles and pederasts "groom" children (and often times their parents) to gain their trust and confidence.

Well worth the reads.

The grooming process of a child sexual predator
http://www.families.com/blog/the-grooming-process-of-a-child-sexual-predator

How pedophiles groom our children and us
http://www.renegadepopo.com/how-pedophiles-groom--printer-version.php
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4417534&postcount=6

Pederasty or paederasty (US /ˈpɛdəræsti/ or UK /ˈpiːdəræsti/) is a (usually erotic) homosexual relationship between an adult male and a pubescent or adolescent male. The word pederasty derives from Greek (paiderastia) "love of boys", a compound derived from παῖς (pais) "child, boy" and ἐραστής (erastēs) "lover".

 

[Kdall]

I have bad news for you people who were planning on crossing dressing as a very famous morally and gender confused person for Halloween:

Hollywood Retail Folds to LGBT Pressure and Pulls Caitlyn Jenner Costume

Aug. 26, 2015

Halloween retailer Spirit Halloween, which previously defended its decision to sell a costume inspired by Bruce Jenner’s gender transition, caved to pressure from LGBT groups, and pulled the costume from its website Wednesday.

The “Call Me Caitlyn Unisex Adult Costume,” which satirizes the former Olympian’s likeness, as seen on the cover of the July issue of Vanity Fair, sparked outrage online Tuesday, with Twitter users and LGBT advocates describing it as “transphobic.”

Some of those upset by the costume also made violent threats
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollyw...tyln-jenner-halloween-costume-sparks-outrage/

towards anyone planning on going as the transgender TV star...

Read more: http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollyw...o-lgbt-pressure-pulls-caityln-jenner-costume/

Violent threats? Don't go mocking the "T" in the LGBTQ acronym or else.

Twice in one week I have now agreed with you aCdub. Outrage over this costume is ridiculous. If I'm not mistaken, the costume manufacturer was inundated with requests to make both this costume and a Cecil the Lion's Killer Dentist outfit complete with severed lion head. They were simply responding to what their customers wanted

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Twice in one week I have now agreed with you aCdub. Outrage over this costume is ridiculous. If I'm not mistaken, the costume manufacturer was inundated with requests to make both this costume and a Cecil the Lion's Killer Dentist outfit complete with severed lion head. They were simply responding to what their customers wanted

Let's go for three:

Bruce Jenner (like all transvestites/genital mutilators) is an extremely sick individual who is in desperate need of spiritual and psychological therapy. Why these gender confused people identify with the sexual deviants of the homosexual movement is beyond me (misery loves company).

In a righteous society Jenner would be getting the help that he so desperately needs, not influencing others by parading around his mental illness in the form of a woman.

(And this is where Kdall and aCW part ways).

BTW: Jenner will probably plead guilty to vehicular manslaughter but most likely won't spend a day in jail.

http://www.examiner.com/article/caitlyn-jenner-s-vehicular-manslaughter-trial-coming-close

I mentioned in Part 3 that the Russians prohibit transsexuals from driving, due to the amount of accidents that they're responsible for.
http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-bans-transgender-drivers-2015-1

 

[Kdall]

Let's go for three:

In a righteous society Jenner would be getting the help that he so desperately needs, not influencing others by parading around his mental illness in the form of a woman.

(And this is where Kdall and aCW part ways).

lol it's weird to me I'll admit. But yes, we do part ways on this one

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Let's go for three:

In a righteous society Jenner would be getting the help that he so desperately needs, not influencing others by parading around his mental illness in the form of a woman.

(And this is where Kdall and aCW part ways).

lol it's weird to me I'll admit. But yes, we do part ways on this one

In Scott Lively's extremely educational book "Redeeming the Rainbow", (found in the index on page 1 under "Agenda"), he has a segment on transvestites and transsexuals. After I do a extensive segment on education (mostly dealing with public education: it's roots here in the United States, how secular humanists hijacked it, the propaganda that the sexual anarchist/LGBTQueer movements use to indoctrinate children and the vital importance of public education and how people of decency/faith can get it back), I should do a segment on gender identity disorder so that people (including myself) have a better understanding of it.

I'll post a few more pages of what's currently going on legislatively and culturally before I start the segment on public education.

 

[GFR7]

In a righteous society Jenner would be getting the help that he so desperately needs, not influencing others by parading around his mental illness in the form of a woman.

In a healthy and righteous society, Jenner would never have had this sexual identity conflict in the first place, and hence would need no help. A righteous society with a bunch of sexually confused people running for spiritual/psychological help would not really be righteous nor healthy.

 

[Town Heretic]

In a righteous society Jenner would be getting the help that he so desperately needs, not influencing others by parading around his mental illness in the form of a woman.

In a healthy and righteous society, Jenner would never have had this sexual identity conflict in the first place, and hence would need no help..

In a righteous society no one would need help, or have to judge his neighbor, because, you know, everyone in it would be righteous. lain: (mic drop)



Isn't grace great? Isn't it great that we can rely on that and not on our own goodness...because doing that would be like trying to surf on one of those styrofoam boards they sold when I was a kid.

 

[GFR7]

In a righteous society no one would need help, or have to judge his neighbor, because, you know, everyone in it would be righteous. lain: (mic drop)



Isn't grace great? Isn't it great that we can rely on that and not on our own goodness...because doing that would be like trying to surf on one of those styrofoam boards they sold when I was a kid.

My point was a valid one. So why the sarcasm?