Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nang's SPOTD is Tet's Hit Out of the Park!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Nang View Post
    No need . . . I am not a "Calvinist" (whatever you may think that is).
    Yes, both you, and he,, being the wet noodles that you are, don't want to offend each other-Herod-ette, and Pilate-ette.

    And, yes,witchiepoo, you are a satanic Calvinist. Face you, your evil-ness. Members of the boc, which excludes you,have
    Saint John W

    Comment


    • Originally posted by tetelestai View Post
      They are deniers of the new covenant.

      So, they parrot their standard Dispy propaganda.

      It's code for "we deny the new covenant"
      You deny the Lord Jesus Christ, flipping the bird at him, demon, parroting your father, the devil.

      So there.
      Saint John W

      Comment


      • Originally posted by tetelestai View Post
        Darby taught that a secret parenthetical dispensation was inserted into God's dealings with Israel.
        Vs.


        “A secret parenthetical time period is a false theory made up by fallible men.”-Preterist con man “tetelestai,” AKA Craigie

        You teach that, in contrast to Darby, you are taught by infallible men.

        The habitual liar of TOL-that satan's Craigie.
        Saint John W

        Comment


        • The following quote is from Samuel Prideaux Tregelles (1813-1875)

          Tregelles was a former Plymouth Brethren

          After his days in the Plymouth Brethren, Tregelles wrote a book called " The Hope Of Christ's Second Coming" in 1864.

          In his book, Tregelles addressed the "secret rapture":


          "I am not aware that there was any definite teaching that there would be a secret rapture of the Church at a secret coming, until this was given forth as an "utterance" in Mr. Irving’s Church, from what was there received as being the voice of the Spirit. But whether any one ever asserted such a thing or not, it was from that supposed revelation that the modern doctrine and the modern phraseology respecting it arose. It came not from Holy Scripture, but from that which falsely pretended to be the Spirit of God, while not owning the true doctrine of our Lord’s incarnation in the same flesh and blood as His brethren, but without taint of sin." - Footnote 1 for Chapter 9, pg 35.
          (1 Cor 1:13 KJV) Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Nang View Post
            "Rightly dividing" the word of God means to faithfully exegete all of it; comparing every scripture with all scripture.
            It's rightly dividing the word of truth (of that which you don't know what it means 2 Timothy 2:15 KJV). Get it straight! The word of God is already rightly divided. All of the one apostle of the Gentiles writing to the one Body of Christ (the thirteenth apostle's thirteen epistles) in the form of sound words of Romans through Philemon, are all fit neatly together!

            I do not believe it is right or necessary to...
            We know. You just mix it all in the Bible blunder blender instead.
            2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

            Paul defines the word of truth as the gospel of your salvation (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV, Ephesians 1:13 KJV). Now, study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed by rightly dividing it!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by tetelestai View Post
              The following quote is from Samuel Prideaux Tregelles (1813-1875)

              Tregelles was a former Plymouth Brethren

              After his days in the Plymouth Brethren, Tregelles wrote a book called " The Hope Of Christ's Second Coming" in 1864.

              In his book, Tregelles addressed the "secret rapture":


              "I am not aware that there was any definite teaching that there would be a secret rapture of the Church at a secret coming, until this was given forth as an "utterance" in Mr. Irving’s Church, from what was there received as being the voice of the Spirit. But whether any one ever asserted such a thing or not, it was from that supposed revelation that the modern doctrine and the modern phraseology respecting it arose. It came not from Holy Scripture, but from that which falsely pretended to be the Spirit of God, while not owning the true doctrine of our Lord’s incarnation in the same flesh and blood as His brethren, but without taint of sin." - Footnote 1 for Chapter 9, pg 35.
              The following quote is from Craigie the Clown:


              "So, they were saved, but not technically until 70AD."-"expert" stupid Craigie on salvation


              Corky Craigie the Clown-a closet Catholic.

              Sit down, you punk.
              Saint John W

              Comment


              • Originally posted by tetelestai View Post
                The following quote is from Samuel Prideaux Tregelles (1813-1875)

                Tregelles was a former Plymouth Brethren

                After his days in the Plymouth Brethren, Tregelles wrote a book called " The Hope Of Christ's Second Coming" in 1864.

                In his book, Tregelles addressed the "secret rapture":


                "I am not aware that there was any definite teaching that there would be a secret rapture of the Church at a secret coming, until this was given forth as an "utterance" in Mr. Irving’s Church, from what was there received as being the voice of the Spirit. But whether any one ever asserted such a thing or not, it was from that supposed revelation that the modern doctrine and the modern phraseology respecting it arose. It came not from Holy Scripture, but from that which falsely pretended to be the Spirit of God, while not owning the true doctrine of our Lord’s incarnation in the same flesh and blood as His brethren, but without taint of sin." - Footnote 1 for Chapter 9, pg 35.
                Here are quotes from Corky the Clown on TOL:


                "Jesus never physically returned, and never will physically return to planet earth after He ascended to Heaven"-Preterist deceiver Tet.


                “And that is what happened. The Lord came in a way that everyone could see Him. However, He never touched planet earth, and when this event was over, He then sat on the throne in Heaven NOT on planet earth.”-Tet.


                "Everyone" that saw Him, according to Craigie, was Josephus, and Wikipedia. Wait....


                Vs.

                "Tet is a preterist that believes Christ already returned in 70 AD via the Roman Army."-Tambora, on another TOL thread

                "Correct, and thanks for making it clear that it was the Roman army that was His return."-stupid Craigie

                "The Roman army destroyed Jerusalem in 70AD. That is what Jesus meant when He said He will return."-Gomer Tet.



                Corkie Craigie's Big Top AD 70/Preterist con job marches on...
                Saint John W

                Comment


                • Originally posted by heir View Post
                  Get it straight!
                  You're a Darby follower.

                  You deny the New Covenant.

                  As long as you continue to follow John Nelson Darby, and deny the NC, you will never know how to rightly divide the word of truth.

                  You try to put new wine in old wineskins.
                  (1 Cor 1:13 KJV) Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Nang View Post
                    I do not believe it is right or necessary to chop, eliminate, or take away any portion of Holy Scripture from the entirety of Holy Scripture.
                    Those who rightly divide the word of truth (there's that pesky term you don't know the meaning of again) believe all scripture. You are the one's who spiritualize everything that is inconvenient away. ssssss
                    2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

                    Paul defines the word of truth as the gospel of your salvation (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV, Ephesians 1:13 KJV). Now, study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed by rightly dividing it!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by john w View Post
                      "by that logic"(one of his stock zingers), atheism is true.
                      Nang like to say something like that, too just like godofthisworldrulz..."using your logic"...
                      2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

                      Paul defines the word of truth as the gospel of your salvation (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV, Ephesians 1:13 KJV). Now, study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed by rightly dividing it!

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by heir View Post
                        ssssss
                        The above speaks for itself.
                        (1 Cor 1:13 KJV) Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

                        Comment


                        • So nice of heir to drop in and parrot her standard Dispensational propaganda.

                          heir and GM are Exhibit A and Exhibit B of mindless John Nelson Darby followers.
                          (1 Cor 1:13 KJV) Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by tetelestai View Post
                            The above speaks for itself.
                            You assert that atheism is true.
                            Saint John W

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by tetelestai View Post
                              So nice of heir to drop in and parrot her standard Dispensational propaganda.

                              heir and GM are Exhibit A and Exhibit B of mindless John Nelson Darby followers.
                              The record-more "Darby....." references, in only 9 pages, than ever!!


                              You stupid clown-most of TOL laughs at you, and probably your wife, who sees so little of you, as you are so obsessed with us meanie dispensationalists, you spend more "time with us" on TOL, and following your man, Hank Hanegraaf, from which you spam/copy'npaste/plagiarize, along with J. Stewart Russell, and Max King, than her, or your "family."
                              Saint John W

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by tetelestai View Post
                                You're a Darby follower.

                                You deny the New Covenant.

                                As long as you continue to follow John Nelson Darby, and deny the NC, you will never know how to rightly divide the word of truth.

                                You try to put new wine in old wineskins.
                                You're a Russell follower, denying the redemption of the body, the change, denying that signs are visible, denying that "God the Father"should be addressed as such, denying that the Lord Jesus Christ is a man, denying that the body of Christ is saved right now, denying that there is more than one piece of good news in the book, denying that there is a law against murder, denying that the Roman army was not the second coming, denying that we should see the second coming, but then, lying about that..................


                                Just a small sample of your satanic "doctrine," punk, and I've proven each one of them, by your own words, demon, so save the satanic, wimpy "response."
                                Saint John W

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X