Why new posters should not automatically be trusted nor believed

[musterion]

Always thought I have a pretty good troll sniffer.

http://www.atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/archive/index.php/t-22523.html

This was one of them...

http://theologyonline.com/archive/index.php/t-105555.html

Note the one who said he'd play the part of a leftist Calvinist. We have at least one of those. Lots of posters here are not and never were what they claim to be. But God knows. So...

 

[Nick M]

Some are much more subtil.

 

[Tambora]

Lots of posters here are not and never were what they claim to be.

List the usermanes of the ones you know to be lying.

 

[musterion]

What's a usermane?

 

[musterion]

I'd love to know who DanDare was back then. Seems I made an impression on him.

That stuff is so hard to read. The true believers are like a parody of themselves. And Musterion is a smarmy ****wit. Someone has to seriously challenge him on his "I know something but I wont tell you because you wont like it" ********. It means he can drop bombs but can't have his underlying opinion examined for validity. What a **** head.

Yeah, I do that with inept trolls.

 

[ok doser]

I'd love to know who DanDare was back then. Seems I made an impression on him.

next time use a crowbar :thumb:

 

[musterion]

next time use a crowbar :thumb:

You make Obama cry.

 

[Tambora]

What's a usermane?

Typo for username.

 

[ok doser]

What's a usermane?

must be a horse thing :idunno:

 

[musterion]

I have my suspicions, as we all do. Biggest red flag is inconsistency, which takes a little time and attention to spot.

And by troll, I probably should say moby. It's more precise for describing someone who ain't what they want you to think they are. A sock puppet is a form of moby...both are out to deceive. Actual trolls tend not to hide their agenda.