Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[aCultureWarrior]

BIGOTS!!!!

Michael Sam released by St. Louis
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/despit...ky-theories-about-gay-athletes-051702850.html

Poor Mikey, he'll no longer be able to "value the aesthetic" of his fellow teammates nekked in the lockerroom.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4026926&postcount=1810

 

[GFR7]

BIGOTS!!!!

Michael Sam released by St. Louis
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/despit...ky-theories-about-gay-athletes-051702850.html

Poor Mikey, he'll no longer be able to "value the aesthetic" of his fellow teammates nekked in the lockerroom.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4026926&postcount=1810

:AMR1:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Regarding violence by dads:

I talked about in Part 1 about a good buddy of mine that took his young daughter (who was 5ish) to a McDonald's in the neighborhood that they lived in. When she told him that she had to go potty and that she wanted to go into the little girls room by herself, he was somewhat hesitant. He decided to let her go and repositioned himself near the restroom door so that he could see her come out and hopefully hear if anything unusual was going on inside.

A couple of minutes later a big black transvestite walked out of the women's room and exited the restaurant. As my buddy got up to go to the restroom door, his little girl came out. He questioned her thoroughly about what went on in the restroom (she was unaware that a male dressed in women's clothing was in there, and he didn't tell her as there are many things that young children don't need to know, this being one of them).

That being said: If my buddy's little girl had come out of the restroom crying and had said "That lady touched me where mommy said no one should touch me!", I know my buddy well enough to say that the tranny's makeup would have been...ahem...'smeared' before the police arrived to arrest him.

Recoil in horror alwight and GayForReal7, but that's how us dad's think and react.

 

[GFR7]

Regarding violence by dads:

I talked about in Part 1 about a good buddy of mine that took his young daughter (who was 5ish) to a McDonald's in the neighborhood that they lived in. When she told him that she had to go potty and that she wanted to go into the little girls room by herself, he was somewhat hesitant. He decided to let her go and repositioned himself near the restroom door so that he could see her come out and hopefully hear if anything unusual was going on inside.

A couple of minutes later a big black transvestite walked out of the women's room and exited the restaurant. As my buddy got up to go to the restroom door, his little girl came out. He questioned her thoroughly about what went on in the restroom (she was unaware that a male dressed in women's clothing was in there, and he didn't tell her as there are many things that young children don't need to know, this being one of them).

That being said: If my buddy's little girl had come out of the restroom crying and had said "That lady touched me where mommy said no one should touch me!", I know my buddy well enough to say that the tranny's makeup would have been...ahem...'smeared' before the police arrived to arrest him.

Recoil in horror alwight and GayForReal7, but that's how us dad's think and react.

I never said I wouldn't fully understand these actions. :AMR1: But it might be as effective if he called the police, had the person arrested and charged, and then explained things to his child. I don't believe in the transgender bathroom movement, in any case.

 

[GFR7]

Addendum:
A "Church" in Germany put out a video by a group called "One Door" about approving gender-bender restrooms. (ie we should ALL use 'one door' to the restroom)-- Anyone who watches this ad will see the absolutely bizarre heights which this "church" movement has reached in Europe: It is actually alarming.

*WARNING: Watch at your own risk*

Bizarre Gender Bending Propaganda from German ‘Church’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9X0PbuyWX6o

 

[alwight]

That being said: If my buddy's little girl had come out of the restroom crying and had said "That lady touched me where mommy said no one should touch me!", I know my buddy well enough to say that the tranny's makeup would have been...ahem...'smeared' before the police arrived to arrest him.

Recoil in horror alwight and GayForReal7, but that's how us dad's think and react.

Hang on a minute here, let's presume for a moment that a transvestite is just a transvestite, not a paedophile, and that the scene is an adults only bar (i.e. no kids).
Should Peter LaBarbera be entitled to physically assault this person if he notices him coming out of the female "bathroom" (as you Americans so quaintly like to call it)? :think:

You may also like to ponder the fact that transvestites are generally speaking straight men.
What would a gay transvestite want with young girls anyway? :think:

Also, male paedophiles are currently quite free to use male toilets in full expectation of leaving without the likes of "Porno Pete" physically assaulting them.

I realise that you simply want paint a picture of homosexuals involved in bizarre, extraverted behaviour, endangering children, boys more usually, except when you think that girls being molested is grist to your mill, because a fairer and more balanced truth does not help your hate filled homophobic agenda.

The real truth is that, sure enough, some humans do do some pretty bizarre things by most people's standards while others may indeed seek to do bad things to children whether or not they happen to be gay or straight.

However you and your favourite hate filled organisation aCW simply uses such atypical human behaviour from one side only to misinform about homosexuals through a prism of rather nasty and spiteful bigotry. lain:

 

[GFR7]

Hang on a minute here, let's presume for a moment that a transvestite is just a transvestite, not a paedophile, and that the scene is an adults only bar (i.e. no kids).
Should Peter LaBarbera be entitled to physically assault this person if he notices him coming out of the female "bathroom" (as you Americans so quaintly like to call it)? :think:

You may also like to ponder the fact that transvestites are generally speaking straight men.
What would a gay transvestite want with young girls anyway? :think:

Also, male paedophiles are currently quite free to use male toilets in full expectation of leaving without the likes of "Porno Pete" physically assaulting them.

I realise that you simply want paint a picture of homosexuals involved in bizarre, extraverted behaviour, endangering children, boys more usually, except when you think that girls being molested is grist to your mill, because a fairer and more balanced truth does not help your hate filled homophobic agenda.

The real truth is that, sure enough, some humans do do some pretty bizarre things by most people's standards while others may indeed seek to do bad things to children whether or not they happen to be gay or straight.

However you and your favourite hate filled organisation aCW simply uses such atypical human behaviour from one side only to misinform about homosexuals through a prism of rather nasty and spiteful bigotry. lain:

You have a point there: Transvestites if anything would molest a little boy (rarely) and certainly not a female child.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by musterion
Nothing at all potentially harmful about exposing kids to homosexuality.

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/g...out/index.html

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/g...ubs/index.html

Nope. Nothing at all.

Yeah, i tried to bring this up ages ago, but aCW was not impressed.

Nope, not impressed at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFR7
Well, after encountering a certain extremist mindset of a particular poster here -whose explosion terrified me and taught me a lesson - I am now convinced that a gradual counter-educational movement is the answer.

1. There can be LGBTQ taught in schools, but there must be a counter-teaching just as available and just as strong.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4004717&postcount=1380

Out of curiousity musterion, was the purpose of your post to show that education is only one of the many areas that the homosexual agenda has permeated since homosexuality was decrimiinalized, or a subliminal message for parents to get their children out of public schools?

Brian Camenker is not anti public education, he's against homosexual indoctrination. Peter LaBarbera to my knowledge never belittles public education, just the indoctrination of children by homosexual activists. The late Pastor Ken Hutcherson sent his children to public school and was active in demonstrating against the National Day of Silence held in their school. Scott Lively wrote an article on how to take back our public schools (see Part 1's table of contents the page and post #). He even mentions how to go about fixing education on his Lively for Governor website.
http://livelyforgovernor.com/

I'll do an entire segment on education, coming up soon. I'm just curious what was the intent behind your post.

 

[GFR7]

Quote:
Originally Posted by musterion
Nothing at all potentially harmful about exposing kids to homosexuality.

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/g...out/index.html

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/g...ubs/index.html

Nope. Nothing at all.



Nope, not impressed at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFR7
Well, after encountering a certain extremist mindset of a particular poster here -whose explosion terrified me and taught me a lesson - I am now convinced that a gradual counter-educational movement is the answer.

1. There can be LGBTQ taught in schools, but there must be a counter-teaching just as available and just as strong.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4004717&postcount=1380

Uh yeah.......... grrrrrrrrr.................yeah, that was because you were sending me psycho PMs - and telling me I was a fraud for no reason at all - - right when I'd really and truly come to believe you were Peter LaBarbera himself
because a poster had PMed me that this might be the case.
(before you went psycho on me). I had already communicated with LaBarbera online and knew his style was gracious, intelligent, manly--and then you sent those psycho rants.

Do you have any idea how that devastated me?

YOU try being shocked and creeped out like that;

see if you feel like posting something counter to the person who did that to you. :madmad: .

I went from thinking you were this:

PETER LABARBERA, A CHRISTIAN WARRIOR

to knowing what you really are:

A CULTURE WARRIOR:

:chuckle: :chuckle:

 

[Nazaroo]

Uh yeah.......... grrrrrrrrr.................yeah, that was because you were sending me psycho PMs - and telling me I was a fraud for no reason at all -
Do you have any idea how that devastated me?

YOU try being shocked and creeped out like that;

see if you feel like posting something counter to the person who did that to you. .

He's a cop. No explanation needed.

He deals with criminals all day, and now he sees everyone as a criminal.

He has the classic and all too common case of Pig-itis.

I've haven't seen many cases this extreme,
but then I'm not a criminal so I don't deal with cops daily.

I can understand the insane paranoia though:

Think about it: if he is who he really says he is,
he could be the last heterosexual cop on the force,
at least where he works.
And he's too dumb to quit.

Thats like being the Last of the Mohecans:
Not only do the Whites want to kill you,
so do the indigenous Natives.

 

[Truster]

Nothing at all potentially harmful about exposing kids to homosexuality.

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen2/14b/GLSEN-Conference-040514/coming-out/index.html

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen2/14b/GLSEN-Conference-040514/gay-youth-clubs/index.html

Nope. Nothing at all.

Anyone who approves or thinks well of those that commit the perversion of homosexuality is as guilty of the sin as those that commit such acts. If society allow their pride marches then the collective guilt of that society shall be dealt with. The act of ''coming out'' is to seek that approval. Whenever I see disasters reported I always look at the map to find to closest city and type sodomite pride into a search engine and sure enough the nearest city has been deceived into approving of their perversions.
The term homophobia has within itself the clue as to what the word means and based on scripture its easy to understand why.

 

[GFR7]

He's a cop. No explanation needed.

He deals with criminals all day, and now he sees everyone as a criminal.

He has the classic and all too common case of Pig-itis.

I've haven't seen many cases this extreme,
but then I'm not a criminal so I don't deal with cops daily.

I can understand the insane paranoia though:

Think about it: if he is who he really says he is,
he could be the last heterosexual cop on the force,
at least where he works.
And he's too dumb to quit.

Thats like being the Last of the Mohecans:
Not only do the Whites want to kill you,
so do the indigenous Natives.

:think: You may be onto something there.......you just may be.......

 

[GFR7]

Does this make it better, or worse?

Does this make it better, or worse?

aCW:So in your opinion, do these changes make the whole thing better, or might it actually make it worse?

One thing you probably won't find at Oakland's first LGBT Pride Parade on Sunday: partially clad men in leather chaps.

What you will find is the Jolly Trolly from Children's Fairyland, pony rides, antique fire engines and singer/drummer Sheila E. Instead of kicking off with Dykes on Bikes, as is the tradition in San Francisco, Oakland's parade starts with Tykes on Trikes.

"We had some leather groups from San Francisco who wanted to come, and we politely declined.
We want to keep this G-rated," said Carlos Uribe, one of the organizers. "We don't want to compete with San Francisco Pride, we just want to offer a more family-friendly, diverse celebration. Sort of an end-of-summer bookend to SF Pride."

Oakland - home to more same-sex families than almost any city in the country - is expanding its traditional Pride party this year with a seven-block parade up Broadway. The event includes an all-day music festival in the Uptown neighborhood, with four stages and children's activities ranging from a petting zoo to puppet shows.

................

"We're going to be the most family-friendly Pride parade anywhere, ever," said Amber Todd, chair of Oakland Pride. "We'll have something for everyone - gay, straight, pansexual, kids. My 75-year-old mother's coming, and she's as straight as the day is long."

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Oakland-launches-its-own-version-of-a-Pride-parade-5722246.php

 

[PureX]

Once gays are finally allowed to live like anyone else, these silly parades will vanish. They originated from a need of public affirmation for people who have had to live under the yoke of shame and oppression. And as such they were needed. But once the shame and oppression are abated, the need for public affirmation will abate as well.

I never went to or supported a gay pride parade because I did not respect or appreciate the affirmation of hedonism that was always intertwined with them. I support equal rights for the GLBT community, but I do not support hedonism. And it's because the GLBT community did not separate themselves from the hedonist ideal right from the start that they've been subjected to the very nasty lies and hateful bigotry of folks like aCL.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Anyone who approves or thinks well of those that commit the perversion of homosexuality is as guilty of the sin as those that commit such acts. If society allow their pride marches then the collective guilt of that society shall be dealt with. The act of ''coming out'' is to seek that approval. Whenever I see disasters reported I always look at the map to find to closest city and type sodomite pride into a search engine and sure enough the nearest city has been deceived into approving of their perversions.
The term homophobia has within itself the clue as to what the word means and based on scripture its easy to understand why.

You may be onto something there.......you just may be.......

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Once gays are finally allowed to live like anyone else, these silly parades will vanish. They originated from a need of public affirmation for people who have had to live under the yoke of shame and oppression. And as such they were needed. But once the shame and oppression are abated, the need for public affirmation will abate as well.

I never went to or supported a gay pride parade because I did not respect or appreciate the affirmation of hedonism that was always intertwined with them. I support equal rights for the GLBT community, but I do not support hedonism. And it's because the GLBT community did not separate themselves from the hedonist ideal right from the start that they've been subjected to the very nasty lies and hateful bigotry of folks like aCL.

Other than getting my initials wrong at the end, you may be onto something there.......you just may be.......

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Hang on a minute here, let's presume for a moment that a transvestite is just a transvestite, not a paedophile, and that the scene is an adults only bar (i.e. no kids).
Should Peter LaBarbera be entitled to physically assault this person if he notices him coming out of the female "bathroom" (as you Americans so quaintly like to call it)? :think:

You may also like to ponder the fact that transvestites are generally speaking straight men.
What would a gay transvestite want with young girls anyway? :think:

Also, male paedophiles are currently quite free to use male toilets in full expectation of leaving without the likes of "Porno Pete" physically assaulting them.

I realise that you simply want paint a picture of homosexuals involved in bizarre, extraverted behaviour, endangering children, boys more usually, except when you think that girls being molested is grist to your mill, because a fairer and more balanced truth does not help your hate filled homophobic agenda.

The real truth is that, sure enough, some humans do do some pretty bizarre things by most people's standards while others may indeed seek to do bad things to children whether or not they happen to be gay or straight.

However you and your favourite hate filled organisation aCW simply uses such atypical human behaviour from one side only to misinform about homosexuals through a prism of rather nasty and spiteful bigotry. lain:

You may be onto something there.......you just may be.......

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Now that I've done some Sunday morning mockery, back to bidness.

aCW:So in your opinion, do these changes make the whole thing better, or might it actually make it worse?

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Oakland-launches-its-own-version-of-a-Pride-parade-5722246.php

It reminds me when your movement disallowed NAMBLA from marching in moral degenerate parades. It's all about PR.

Strategies of the Homosexual Movement-"The Overhauling of Straight America"

A media campaign to promote the Gay Victim image should make use of symbols which reduce the mainstream's sense of threat, which lower it's guard, and which enhance the plausibility of victimization. In practical terms, this means that jaunty mustachioed musclemen would keep very low profile in gay commercials and other public presentations, while sympathetic figures of nice young people, old people, and attractive women would be featured. (It almost goes without saying that groups on the farthest margin of acceptability such as NAMBLA, [Ed note -- North American Man-Boy Love Association] must play no part at all in such a campaign: suspected child-molesters will never look like victims.)
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/gay_strategies/overhauling.html

 

[alwight]

You may be onto something there.......you just may be.......

You seem to have become very receptive all of a sudden aCW, perhaps the scales are falling from your eyes? :nono:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
That being said: If my buddy's little girl had come out of the restroom crying and had said "That lady touched me where mommy said no one should touch me!", I know my buddy well enough to say that the tranny's makeup would have been...ahem...'smeared' before the police arrived to arrest him.

Recoil in horror alwight and GayForReal7, but that's how us dad's think and react.

Hang on a minute here, let's presume for a moment that a transvestite is just a transvestite, not a paedophile, and that the scene is an adults only bar (i.e. no kids).
Should Peter LaBarbera be entitled to physically assault this person if he notices him coming out of the female "bathroom" (as you Americans so quaintly like to call it)? :think:

You may also like to ponder the fact that transvestites are generally speaking straight men.
What would a gay transvestite want with young girls anyway? :think:

Ask Coleen Francis, who exposed himself to young girls (a story I covered in an earlier thread).

Monday, 05 November 2012
College Lets “Transgendered” Man Expose Self to Girls in Locker Room

Officials at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington, said that state law renders them powerless to prevent a "transgender" man from using the women's locker room at the school because he supposedly identifies as a woman. The 45-year-old man, who calls himself Colleen Francis, reportedly exposed himself on several occasions to young girls who were using the locker room as part of swimming clubs. But instead of having the man arrested, school officials have insisted that a state non-discrimination law protects the “transgendered” man from prosecution.

“We have to follow a non-discrimination policy with the state,” Jason Wettstein, a spokesman for the college, told CampusReform.org. “State law doesn’t allow us to ignore gender identity as one of the protected classes. Therefore the transgendered individual has the right to use our facilities, including the locker rooms.”

The school rents its swimming pool and locker facilities to local high school swimming teams, as well as to a pair of swimming clubs, and on multiple occasions girls as young as six years old have witnessed the full frontal nudity of Francis as he used the women's facilities. But instead of banning Francis from the locker room, the school has instead installed curtains and directed women and girls using the locker room to change behind them...
http://www.thenewamerican.com/cultu...ered”-man-expose-self-to-girls-in-locker-room