Amen!Bingo.
The commandment against murder is being severely overlooked, here.
Or conveniently ignored.
Amen!Bingo.
The commandment against murder is being severely overlooked, here.
Or conveniently ignored.
Do what people have done for centuries that don't have as much as others ------- do without and make do the best you can.So what would you advocate for those out of work then?
It's not being overlooked or ignored, I simply fail to see any good theology or rationale that abortion is murder. I think that Rome went a bit draconian on many matters when Christianity took over, and abortion was something they overly judged.
Go to any 'free clinic' in America- it will ruin your day.
YAY!No more leftists encouraging a welfare state
Do what people have done for centuries that don't have as much as others ------- do without and make do the best you can.
Double up with others that are having a hard time.
FORCING others to hold your head above water has never worked, and it still doesn't work.
The sad fact is that some folks will not survive.
It's always been that way and always will be
I don't deny crumbs.Well they certainly won't survive with an attitude like that. It's true that any society will always have the poor but without a safety net to protect those in need there'd be more and more who wouldn't survive. Was the rich man right in denying Lazarus even the crumbs off his table? Essentially that's what you advocate if you deny those in hard times any aid.
I don't deny crumbs.
I willingly help those I see in need.
And I would have more to do that with if the gov would quit stealing money out of my pocket.
They haven't been surviving with your attitude either.Well they certainly won't survive with an attitude like that.
If it's ok to steal to help the poor, then let them rob stores for what they need (or their neighbors stuff).Well, you do if you deny the poor any recourse to aid outside of arbitrary charity, that's actually exactly what you're doing.
They haven't been surviving with your attitude either.
None of them are getting out of the slums for it.
All it is doing is dragging a lot of the middle class down to the slums with them.
If it's ok to steal to help the poor, then let them rob stores for what they need (or their neighbors stuff).
Hot wire cars from the dealerships (or their neighbors car).
Heck, just rob a bank.
I mean, you would be heartless to object.
Was the rich man right in denying Lazarus even the crumbs off his table? Essentially that's what you advocate if you deny those in hard times any aid.
Um, yeah, so any governmental safety net to finance aid to those out of work is 'stealing' from others.
lain:
Why a government safety net? Why not a social/personal one?
Strong family bonds, friendships, neighborly care should be the make-up of a "safety net."
Is it the government's fault if entire populations care nothing for their neighbors?
Are we in need of a leftward shift in government, or a shift in culture?
When they forcibly take money from my pocket, yes it's stealing.Um, yeah, so any governmental safety net to finance aid to those out of work is 'stealing' from others.
lain:
When they forcibly take money from my pocket, yes it's stealing.
You talk like I'm against charity.
I'm not.
I'm against stealing.
The welfare money the gov spends is not from charitable donations.
They stole the money and slipped into the 'tax' bracket to disguise the fact it is stealing.
What bonds did Lazarus have?
Do you think the point of the story was that the government should have forced the rich man to help Lazarus?