Trump News
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
The only thing surprising about this is that he claims he shot less holes in one than Kim Jong-il. Absolute tosh all ends up of course but still, kinda funny!
www.independent.co.uk
Trump reveals how many holes-in-one he’s aced – and it’s fewer than Kim Jong-il
The former president repeats his claim that he’s shot no fewer than seven holes-in-one
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
To be fair to Trump, he's not actually orange. He just uses ridiculous tanning agents and mixes his golf clothing with classified documents in boxes and puts them in bathrooms and stuff...
way 2 go
Well-known member
☕️ INDICTED ☙ Wednesday, August 2, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Updates on Senator Katie Britt; sheriff retires with sudden and unexpected "health problems"; newest Trump indictment; Chinese malware psyop; and bad news for the country's credit score.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
Now cast your mind back two years. Remember that none of Trump’s 2020 lawsuits ever got a chance to present evidence, since they were all dismissed on technical or procedural grounds. None of them got to take discovery, either.
But this time, now that he and his lawyers are defendants in a criminal case, President Trump can not only put on evidence of election fraud, but he must. And before that, he will have the right to conduct discovery under the demanding federal rules. And they’re not going to like it.
And, while I’m sure the giddy prosecutors are currently planning to just sit back and make Trump’s lawyers prove there was election fraud, the prosecutors will soon confront another unpleasant surprise related to what they must prove.
Right now, the prosecutors think proving their case will be easy and they won’t have to do much. But, as Trump’s lawyers begin to assemble evidence of election fraud — much of which was already pulled together in 2020 (but never considered by a court) — the DOJ prosecutors will start to realize at some point that they can’t just remain silent. They don’t see it yet, but they will eventually have to prove the negative; they will have to prove that election fraud didn’t happen.
They can’t just rely on “everybody knows” there wasn’t voter fraud. They can’t just wave their hands at the dismissed 2020 cases. They’ll almost certainly have to prove the absence of fraud.
And that, they cannot prove. Not only because proving a negative is incredibly difficult, but because it’s already very clear there was significant fraud, as demonstrated by sources like 2,000 mules. Plus, the more they look into whether fraud happened, the more it will hurt the government case.
Finally, of course, bringing this case two and a half years after January 6th during the middle of a presidential election campaign — against a candidate — is a total Banana Republic move. I’m expecting to see Joe Biden pop up wearing a medal-covered jacket covered any day now.
Which is why Trump wanted to be indicted.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Hahahaha! I love it!
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
From today:
Just yesterday, though, from www.justice.gov:
However corrupt the DOJ/FBI may be, it seems they get some things right. This French-Canadian woman had, they say, sent Trump a poisoned letter back in 2020, and so the DOJ/FBI has put her in prison for the next couple of decades. Here, the "department of injustice" seems to have just struck a painful blow against an anti-Trump terrorist/activist, which seems unaccountable on any notion that the DOJ/FBI are wholly run by enemies of Trump and weaponized against him.
Just yesterday, though, from www.justice.gov:
However corrupt the DOJ/FBI may be, it seems they get some things right. This French-Canadian woman had, they say, sent Trump a poisoned letter back in 2020, and so the DOJ/FBI has put her in prison for the next couple of decades. Here, the "department of injustice" seems to have just struck a painful blow against an anti-Trump terrorist/activist, which seems unaccountable on any notion that the DOJ/FBI are wholly run by enemies of Trump and weaponized against him.
