The New York Times; Feighk and Gheigh

Avajs

Active member
You mean the mission to take back much of the civilized world from the Muslims before they destroyed everything?



Which one?



But you're not sure?



You mean like many of the fathers of modern science having been Christians and/or believed in a Creator, at the very least rejecting naturalistic origins?

The Muslim world kept math alive for a while.
No I don’t mean rhe fathers of modern science, I mean people today who don’t accept what those fathers of modern science have led us to.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
The Muslim world kept math alive for a while.

And they also slaughtered millions of people, subjugated them, and forced them to convert to Islam and Sharia law.

No I don’t mean the fathers of modern science,

Of course you don't, because it destroys your entire argument.

Most of them believed in a Creator.

I mean people today who don’t accept what those fathers of modern science have led us to.

Led us to?

You mean mathematical models of things never observed that have no basis in nor connection to reality?

Yeah, that's quite a brag.

Meanwhile, Christian scientists (who reject methodological naturalism, et al) are out there showing just how far behind we really are as a result of the propagation of the secular idea that live evolved over millions of years.

You don't get "evolution," "big bang," "methodological naturalism," etc., from science.

Science is the process of eliminating bad ideas using evidence.

Interpreting the evidence to support the things I listed above is not science. It's propaganda.
 

Avajs

Active member
And they also slaughtered millions of people, subjugated them, and forced them to convert to Islam and Sharia law.



Of course you don't, because it destroys your entire argument.

Most of them believed in a Creator.



Led us to?

You mean mathematical models of things never observed that have no basis in nor connection to reality?

Yeah, that's quite a brag.

Meanwhile, Christian scientists (who reject methodological naturalism, et al) are out there showing just how far behind we really are as a result of the propagation of the secular idea that live evolved over millions of years

You don't get "evolution," "big bang," "methodological naturalism," etc., from science.

Science is the process of eliminating bad ideas using evidence.

Interpreting the evidence to support the things I listed above is not science. It's propaganda.
How many died in the European religious wars in the 1500’s? How many indigenous people were killed in the New World in the name of the Christian God?
You don’t get to hold up those fathers of modern science as supporting your God when they did not have the benefit of those who came after.
Math scares you, huh? Me too, advanced math is tough. Think it is all just made up and means nothing?
Methodological naturaliism is the basis of science. A collection of the oral sayings and traditions of an obscure mid-East tribe is not
 

Right Divider

Body part
How many died in the European religious wars in the 1500’s?
You seem to completely ignorant of the Muslim invasion of Europe.
How many indigenous people were killed in the New World in the name of the Christian God?
How many indigenous people were killed in the New World by their own indigenous people?

Again, you seem to be completely ignorant of history.
You don’t get to hold up those fathers of modern science as supporting your God when they did not have the benefit of those who came after.
That is dumb.
Math scares you, huh?
No.
Me too, advanced math is tough.
If you're scared of math, you need to seek medical attention immediately.
Methodological naturaliism is the basis of science.
Nonsense. Please demonstrate how we came up with the laws of logic based on "Methodological naturaliism". You're retarded.
 

Avajs

Active member
You seem to completely ignorant of the Muslim invasion of Europe.

How many indigenous people were killed in the New World by their own indigenous people?

Again, you seem to be completely ignorant of history.

That is dumb.

No.

If you're scared of math, you need to seek medical attention immediately.

Nonsense. Please demonstrate how we came up with the laws of logic based on "Methodological naturaliism". You're retarded.
“Retaded” ah just like 5th grade response
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Face it, when you must use personal insults to finish your argument, you have lost.

On the contrary...

Insults are a vice when they substitute for reason prematurely, and a necessity when reason has been willfully rejected.

In other words, reason persuades the willing; rebuke confronts the obstinate.

We insult you because you have rejected reason, not because we are irrational.
 

Avajs

Active member
On the contrary...

Insults are a vice when they substitute for reason prematurely, and a necessity when reason has been willfully rejected.

In other words, reason persuades the willing; rebuke confronts the obstinate.

We insult you because you have rejected reason, not because we are irrational.
No because you lost tbe argument by default
 
Top