ECT The House of Israel and the House of Judah Will Be a Blessing

Interplanner

Well-known member
Of course it counts to me. However, unlike you, I know that the land which the Lord gave to Jacob is on this earth and not somehere else.


About which the NT cares not. It will all be consumed and reformed into the NHNE. That is what the last things the prophets were saying was about, not another episode of Judaism in Judea.
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
Desolate
H8077
שׁממה שׁממה
shemâmâh shimâmâh
shem-aw-maw', shee-mam-aw'
Feminine of H8076; devastation; figuratively astonishment: - (laid, X most) desolate (-ion), waste.

If we are to believe that "astonishment" is the correct translation in this verse then you are even more weird than I imagined:

"Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Astonishment: but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah, and thy land Beulah: for the Lord delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married" (Isa.62:5).​

Who can take you seriously?
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
You calling scripture wrong. Rom 9:8 says that Israel according to the flesh are not the children of God.

That is not what you said. Here is what you said:

The children of israel, Abrahams physical descendants, are not Gods Children Rom 9:8 !

Again, Paul was a physical descendant of Abraham and he is a child of God (Ro.8:16).

I am not calling Scripture wrong but I am saying that you are wrong!
 

beloved57

Well-known member
That is not what you said. Here is what you said:



Again, Paul was a physical descendant of Abraham and he is a child of God (Ro.8:16).

I am not calling Scripture wrong but I am saying that you are wrong!

The physical descendant of Abraham Israel are not the children of God Rom 9:8
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
The physical descendant of Abraham Israel are not the children of God Rom 9:8


Paul definitely called gentile believers seed of Abraham because they were that 'in Christ.' The whole range of Christian truth is that which is true 'in Christ' not in ethnicity or background. Male and female don't even matter for 'in Christ.'
 

beloved57

Well-known member
Paul definitely called gentile believers seed of Abraham because they were that 'in Christ.' The whole range of Christian truth is that which is true 'in Christ' not in ethnicity or background. Male and female don't even matter for 'in Christ.'

Agreed!
 

TweetyBird

New member
If we are to believe that "astonishment" is the correct translation in this verse then you are even more weird than I imagined:

"Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Astonishment: but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah, and thy land Beulah: for the Lord delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married" (Isa.62:5).​

Who can take you seriously?

Words often mean different things dependent on context. The Hebrew can be defined as desolate and forsaken and astonished.

The companion verses to Isa 62 are found in Isaiah 52 and 53 - the greatest book of the OT on prophecy concerning our Lord Jesus Christ.
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
Words often mean different things dependent on context. The Hebrew can be defined as desolate and forsaken and astonished.

It was you who said that the meaning of the verse in regard to Isaiah 62:5 was astonished:

Isaiah 52:14
As many were astonied [=H8074 at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men:

So when we put the meaning which you yourself chose we get this ridiculous translation:

"Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Astonishment: but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah, and thy land Beulah: for the Lord delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married"
(Isa.62:5).​

Your ideas are laughable!
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
It was you who said that the meaning of the verse in regard to Isaiah 62:5 was astonished:



So when we put the meaning which you yourself chose we get this ridiculous translation:

"Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Astonishment: but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah, and thy land Beulah: for the Lord delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married"
(Isa.62:5).​

Your ideas are laughable!



It was to be a great day for the land, but that became true in Christ as the NT says about all promises. It was the believers who would be able to enjoy it, but the unbelievers would go through a wretched period. Not that the land matters, but it is a way of saying to them that they will have a good impact.
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
It was to be a great day for the land, but that became true in Christ as the NT says about all promises.

The NT does not say that all of the Lord's promises have been fulfilled. Anyone in their right mind KNOWS that this prophecy concerning the "land" which the Lord gave to Jacob has not been fulfilled:

"Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen, whither they be gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land...And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have...Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them: and I will place them, and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore. My tabernacle also shall be with them: yea, I will be their God, and they shall be my people" (Ez.37:25-27).​

Here we read that the Lord will set His sanctuary in the midst of the Israelites for ever. And the Israelites "shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob.." Therefore, in the future the Lord will set His sanctuary in the midst of the children of Israel for evermore at the time they will dwell in the land that God gave to Jacob.
 

TweetyBird

New member
It was you who said that the meaning of the verse in regard to Isaiah 62:5 was astonished:



So when we put the meaning which you yourself chose we get this ridiculous translation:

"Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Astonishment: but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah, and thy land Beulah: for the Lord delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married"
(Isa.62:5).​

Your ideas are laughable!

I don't see the problem. Jesus was made desolate when He said He was forsaken by His Father. Forsaken, is to be made desolate. The word, astonishment falls nicely in the prophesies concerning the suffering of Christ on the cross - this is why I quoted Psa 22, Isa 52 and 53. All three words are interconnected.

Jesus is the Sanctuary. John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
 

beloved57

Well-known member
The NT does not say that all of the Lord's promises have been fulfilled. Anyone in their right mind KNOWS that this prophecy concerning the "land" which the Lord gave to Jacob has not been fulfilled:

"Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen, whither they be gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land...And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have...Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them: and I will place them, and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore. My tabernacle also shall be with them: yea, I will be their God, and they shall be my people" (Ez.37:25-27).​

Here we read that the Lord will set His sanctuary in the midst of the Israelites for ever. And the Israelites "shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob.." Therefore, in the future the Lord will set His sanctuary in the midst of the children of Israel for evermore at the time they will dwell in the land that God gave to Jacob.

Israel Abrahams descendants according to the flesh are not the children of God Rom 9:8!
 

Right Divider

Body part
The NT does not say that all of the Lord's promises have been fulfilled. Anyone in their right mind KNOWS that this prophecy concerning the "land" which the Lord gave to Jacob has not been fulfilled:

"Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen, whither they be gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land...And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have...Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them: and I will place them, and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore. My tabernacle also shall be with them: yea, I will be their God, and they shall be my people" (Ez.37:25-27).​

Here we read that the Lord will set His sanctuary in the midst of the Israelites for ever. And the Israelites "shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob.." Therefore, in the future the Lord will set His sanctuary in the midst of the children of Israel for evermore at the time they will dwell in the land that God gave to Jacob.
Agreed; anyone in their right mind.
 

TweetyBird

New member
Agreed; anyone in their right mind.

The Sanctuary is the Temple. Jesus is that Temple - not made with hands. The physical temple no longer exists because Jesus took its place. The pattern of the Heavenly, which is Christ, was made into an earthly temple/tabernacle made with hands for a time and a season. It is gone now, forever. There is no need for it. It accomplished its purpose. We have Jesus who completely reigns and rules in His children, the High Priest of the order of Melchizedek - forever, not of Aaron/Levi. He is the sacrifice, has shed His own blood for sin, sprinkled the mercy seat with His own blood in the Heavenlies. This is all recorded in Heb 4-9.
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
The Sanctuary is the Temple. Jesus is that Temple - not made with hands. The physical temple no longer exists because Jesus took its place.

The following prophecy shows the Lord Jesus returning, and when He returns there will indeed exist a rebuilt temple:

"Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the LORD, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to His temple...And He shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and He shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the LORD an offering in righteousness. Then shall the offering of Judah and Jerusalem be pleasant unto the LORD, as in the days of old, and as in former years" (Mal.3:1,3,4).​

This was not fulfilled when the Lord Jesus walked the earth because at that time there was never an occasion when the "offering of Judah and Jerusalem" was pleasant unto the Lord as in "the days of old, and as in former years".

This prophecy will be fulfilled in the future. Since you have no place for its fulfillment in your eschatology you will pervert what is said.
 
Top