Interplanner
Well-known member
Show me how 'what you meant to RD about needing to leave' has to do with STP's apology...
ECT STP Apology to Interplanner (Sort of)
- Thread starter SaulToPaul 2
- Start date
God's Truth
New member
I was letting him AND ALL READERS know that I had to go and would discuss more later.
You need to stop telling people how to post. You don't realize it but you are not very good at it.
You sound like an ignorant hypocrite.
Maybe these posts from you should be in a private message---for sure more so than mine.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Exactly. :thumb:
glorydaz
Well-known member
It didn't work for you, why do you think anyone would try what you did?
STOP....You are not Jesus, nor are you an Apostles, nor are you a teacher of God's word. Stop.
glorydaz
Well-known member
She only comes on these threads to disrupt and garner attention for herself.
GT is the ultimate :troll:
Yep.
Romans 10 KJV
(2) For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.
(3) For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Yep, so far she has made 17 posts out of the total of 46. This is nothing more than a thread hijacking, and it's becoming more and more pervasive all across this board.
She needs a total smack down.:troll:
Interplanner
Well-known member
Acts 2, 13, 15. You and STP keep saying they don't mean what they say in normal grammar and English because 2P2P would collapse.
That's why I'm not too concerned about their opines.
Interplanner
Well-known member
That is why D'ism is a cult, right there. There are some other incidents that are called good news or announcements. But when you get to the NT it is one. Enter the mistakes of the Judaizers. They invent another Gospel that Paul has to deal with in Gal and is dealt with in Acts 15. But Paul is totally unified with Peter and there is one Gospel, as we know from Gal 2.
The fact that D'ism entitles itself to dissent from Paul in what he says in Gal 1-2, is enough on its own to dismiss it as cult.
Interplanner
Well-known member
There are some entities that are not human that are mentioned: Eph 1, 3, Col 1, 2
Interplanner
Well-known member
STP wrote:
Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post
What little bit he has posted about how to be saved, and about justification, he seems to be correct. This is ultimately the main thing we need to know. I wish he would focus more on these things.
So, my hat's off to him for that.
I don't know what happened, but thought I had posted this response here:
There is no such thing as compartmentalizing the promise to the fathers and the Gospel of justification. STP has this view from breathing too much 2P2P. It is obviously a unity in Acts 13, 2, 3, and 2 Tim 2:8 on which I did a separate thread.
Change your beliefs until it is a unity in your mind.
Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post
What little bit he has posted about how to be saved, and about justification, he seems to be correct. This is ultimately the main thing we need to know. I wish he would focus more on these things.
So, my hat's off to him for that.
I don't know what happened, but thought I had posted this response here:
There is no such thing as compartmentalizing the promise to the fathers and the Gospel of justification. STP has this view from breathing too much 2P2P. It is obviously a unity in Acts 13, 2, 3, and 2 Tim 2:8 on which I did a separate thread.
Change your beliefs until it is a unity in your mind.
Right Divider
Body part
Your interp is completely bogus and that's why I'm not too concerned with your opines.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Right Divider
Body part
I guess that you're interested in a vacation from TOL.
Since you have a fairy tale version of "the NT", I can see how you are so completely confused.
Don't you ever tire of being completely wrong about just about everything?
Interplanner
Well-known member
What fairy tale. use specific points or shut up.
There is nothing confusing about 'if anyone preaches another gospel, he is accursed.' Show me how you confused that with multiple gospesl?
Your latest items about the kingdom of God do not answer what happened in intertestament Judaism. They had beliefs about the kingdom of God, and it sounds like you think they were right but what Jesus said was mistaken.
I know this is a huge challenge but try to speak as completely as you can. You just keep limiting yourself to oneline smackdowns and smartmouthings. It's a horrible way to communicate.
As for online presence, I work over full time and have 3 grandkids and other life. You really know a lot don't you?
There is nothing confusing about 'if anyone preaches another gospel, he is accursed.' Show me how you confused that with multiple gospesl?
Your latest items about the kingdom of God do not answer what happened in intertestament Judaism. They had beliefs about the kingdom of God, and it sounds like you think they were right but what Jesus said was mistaken.
I know this is a huge challenge but try to speak as completely as you can. You just keep limiting yourself to oneline smackdowns and smartmouthings. It's a horrible way to communicate.
As for online presence, I work over full time and have 3 grandkids and other life. You really know a lot don't you?
Right Divider
Body part
Try actually reading the Bible and believing it.
It ACTUALLY says ".... another gospel UNTO YOU". That a key to understanding that passage, but you are too indoctrinated into your fairy tale to see it.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Irrelevant. He only preached one gospel, it was a unity. 2 Tim 2:8 is said at the END of his career. Rom 1 and 2 are all singular Gospel. "According to my Gospel."
Right Divider
Body part
Why was it HIS gospel?
Last edited:
Interplanner
Well-known member
How complicated can you make the one gospel of Gal 1:8? Only D'ists would do it--they have the twots.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Because it saved him. It is not doctrinally only his. I have shown many times he and Peter say the same thing on David, faith, justification, forgiveness, Abraham, whatever. You have the twots. The idea it was just his is some idea some busy 2P2Ps came up with because they have the twots.