Spammers wasteland

[SaulToPaul 2]

Take off your deterministic glasses to avoid proof texting/misinterpreting a verse. We can reject your view without rejecting the Bible properly interpreted.You are a nutball amateur Breen-ite, on the wildwest of the internet.

You need to be instructed in Breenism Proper.

 

[john w]

You need to be instructed in Breenism Proper.

I've been busy fishin', as dem proposons are great lures, working great with "Eagle Eye Zebco!"

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

I've been busy fishin', as dem proposons are great lures, working great with "Eagle Eye Zebco!"

My fishing rod is named Ontological Eye Annie.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Time from Nang to swoop in:

"Yuck, yuck, yuck it up. Bah."

 

[steko]

Working on it but it will take a while to get the Early Church Fathers Proper under the belt.

That'll be uncomfortable. :noid:

 

[john w]

My fishing rod is named Ontological Eye Annie.

Look at all relevant verses without a wrong paradigm.Try a good commentary that will interpret these verses consistent with all relevant verses vs twisting out of context with a poor interpretation. And be balanced, synergetic, using proper propososms, exegesis's, ism's, and aleph's and/or unicials.

 

[musterion]

"Bah."

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Look at all relevant verses without a wrong paradigm.Try a good commentary that will interpret these verses consistent with all relevant verses vs twisting out of context with a poor interpretation. And be balanced, synergetic, using proper propososms, exegesis's, ism's, and aleph's and/or unicials.

How can I know which commentaries are Commentary Proper approved?

 

[musterion]

That'll be uncomfortable. :noid:

You literalistic dispo thug.

Bah.

 

[musterion]

How can I know which commentaries are Commentary Proper approved?

Can't go wrong with A.W. Pink. He hates all the right people.

- Nang

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Don't much care for Nangster. After all, she's NOT up to my high standards/expectations.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

"Bah."

Good representation.

 

[john w]

How can I know which commentaries are Commentary Proper approved?

More obvusciationism. More straw men. You must have a closet full of skeletons.
You have a thinly veiled arrogance. We need conviction and humility, to speak truth in love, not pride.You have fallen into unbiblical, unbalanced teaching and practice.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Can't go wrong with A.W. Pink. He hates all the right people.

- Nang

I don't much trust a guy named, "Mr. Pink," after seeing that movie "Reservoir Dogs."

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Sometimes the best commentaries are, no commentaries.

 

[steko]

Look at all relevant verses without a wrong paradigm.Try a good commentary that will interpret these verses consistent with all relevant verses vs twisting out of context with a poor interpretation. And be balanced, synergetic, using proper propososms, exegesis's, ism's, and aleph's and/or unicials.

I had an uncle once. I think I was related to him in some way.

 

[musterion]

I don't much trust a guy named, "Mr. Pink," after seeing that movie "Reservoir Dogs."

I know, makes my ear hurt.

 

[steko]

Sometimes the best commentaries are, no commentaries.

I agree with your commentary on that one.

 

[musterion]

Only one thing that can help y'all now. Apply liberally to affected areas. Keep out of reach of children and them cursed Arminians.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Where's PPS?? I suppose he's "Googling" fancy words to use to make the rest of us feel like High School dropouts??