The Pope is making a damn fool of himself...
TRANSLATION: "I choose to continue following the entirely non-authoritative opinions of my preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect, rather than obeying the authoritative teachings of Christ's one historic Church!"The Pope is making a damn fool of himself, under the guise of friendship- we all see it for what it is- fools shall be fools!
The Successor of St. Peter comes in the name and authority of Jesus Christ (Mt. 16:18-19).He comes in his own name.
Does the pope linger: have to pay to get that tiaraThe Successor of St. Peter...
The Successor of St. Peter comes in the name and authority of Jesus Christ (Mt. 16:18-19).
Not true at all. The Papacy is plain and clear on the pages of the Bible, albeit not under that name. "Papacy" is an English bastardization of the word Pater.It is not subject to your specific church authority- you sit there and talk about 'man made', but your special authority is nowhere written except by mere men much time later.....
I'm afraid it is, since the Catholic Church is in fact that one historic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself in 33 A.D.It is not subject to your specific church authority...
The inherent doctrinal authority of Christ's one historic Catholic Church is established in both Divine Revelation (Scripture and Tradition), and in the events of ecclesiastical history. As Christ's one historic Church, it's formal teachings carry the doctrinal authority of Jesus Christ himself (Lk. 10:16; cf. 1 Tim. 3:15)....you sit there and talk about 'man made', but your special authority is nowhere written...
"Mere men" in the specific sense in which the apostles were "mere men," indeed, as their (the apostles') ordained successors, the bishops....except by mere men much time later.
False. The Roman Catholic religion began with Constantine in AD 325....[T]he Catholic Church is in fact that one historic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself in 33 A.D.
"...[L]et’s examine the Roman Catholic claim that it is the “first church.” Nowhere in the New Testament will you find the “one true church” doing any of the following: praying to Mary, praying to the saints, venerating Mary, submitting to a pope, having a select priesthood, baptizing an infant, observing the ordinances of baptism and the Lord’s Supper as sacraments, or passing on apostolic authority to successors of the apostles. All of these are core elements of the Roman Catholic faith. If most of the core elements of the Roman Catholic Church were not practiced by the New Testament Church (the first church and one true church), how then can the Roman Catholic Church be the first church?..." Full text: What was the first / original church? Is the original / first church the true church?The inherent doctrinal authority of Christ's one historic Catholic Church...
Not true at all. The Papacy is plain and clear on the pages of the Bible, albeit not under that name. "Papacy" is an English bastardization of the word Pater.
Who said anything about "Roman Catholicism"? I was talking about the Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself in 33 A.D., not the Roman Rite of the Church established later. Learn the qualitative difference.False. The Roman Catholic religion began with Constantine in AD 325.
[Is Rome the One True Church? , The Divine Rebuke of Corrupt Religious Authority ] ...[T]he Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself in 33 A.D....
First off, your quotation of me in Post #192 is a case of false attribution, since I never posted any such thing. Once again, serpent is caught lying (Ex. 20:16; Prov. 19:5).Quote Originally Posted by Cruciform >
[Is Rome the One True Church? , The Divine Rebuke of Corrupt Religious Authority]
See:See:
Is apostolic succession biblical?
:yawn: I'm not here to teach you English 101.[Is Rome the One True Church? , The Divine Rebuke of Corrupt Religious Authority ] First off, your quotation of me in Post #192 is a case of false attribution...
There are more pedophiles in Protestantism than in the Catholic Church---better tend to that beam in your eye, friend.We aren't under the order of pedophiles.
No, you're just here to lie, as you do all too frequently on this forum (Post #194).I'm not here to teach you English 101.
:yawn: You're projecting again (Eph 4:14). :noway:[:yawn: As a reminder, Cruciform is a grace-perverter linger: (Gal. 1:6–8), bound by traditions (Mt 15:9) and deceitful in all his ways (Eph. 4:14). See: Cruciform] ...[Y]ou're just here to lie...
Post #197You're...
Does "Cruciform" have access to "insider information" not available to the rest of us?There are more pedophiles in Protestantism than in the Catholic Church---better tend to that beam in your eye, friend.