A class that covers formal fallacies, informal fallacies, evaluating the arguments of other people, formulating good objections to arguments, and developing good arguments of their own.
An introductory philosophy class that covers how philosophy differs from other academic disciplines and philosophical issues associated with ethics, metaphysics, and epistemology. I was thinking that the class could discuss the mind/body problem, rationalism, empiricism, freedom and determinism, ethical theories, the problem of evil and so on. Moreover, it can include how one goes about philosophizing.
Ehhh. I'd rather teach them rhetoric as its own subject, then.
As we've seen on far too many occasions from Traditio on this board, the deeper one goes into the study of philosophy as its own subject, the more abstract and overthought one becomes.
I agree with Purex, that critical thinking and logic should start at the primary level, along with reading comprehension and writing.
I like the idea of high school students learning to identify fallacies (a test in this hypothetical class could involve watching ten minutes of any major news broadcast and pointing out each one), especially ad hominem, No True Scotsman, and begging the question, but many of the "What is life" philosophy questions are of little use to teenagers.
That being said, I'd love to see high school students debating the philosophical points of what makes something moral or immoral.
Far too many church-sheltered individuals only have spoon-fed responses to those types of questions.
Of course, all of this would require teachers who are passionate about breaking their students away from the lockstep rank-and-file automatons that our system seems hellbent on producing en masse, and are willing to do so with very little monetary compensation, as our system also seems hellbent on driving our teachers insane.
I'd love to see it offered as an elective.