Liberal opens fire in Dallas at liberal protest
- Thread starter Nick M
- Start date
Feral Phoenician
New member
More than a "coincidence", but I sincerely doubt it was an actual false flag.
The killers were waiting for something like this. Opportunity knocked, and they answered.
Is the government possibly going to try and capitalize on this? Sure. Politics attract Dark Triads (Sociopaths/Psychopaths, Narcissists, and Machiavellians). While decent people mourn the fallen and try to rationalize, Dark Triads rub their hands together and plot. Mark my words; the slain officers won't be in the ground before politicians begin holding press conferences (both sides of the aisle) and exploiting this.
It's easy to see a "conspiracy theory" in this though, as it came at one heck of a time.
theophilus
Well-known member
Woe to them who have decided to kill in the name of a false god.
musterion
Well-known member
If you're right, and you probably are, the end result will be no different from a false flag. The regime will use it exactly the same either way -- to further distract from Clinton and to gin up one more excuse to confiscate guns from law abiding citizens.
I don't rule out that some associated with the protest were involved or knew about it.
I know that killing cops does start an intense investigation that is going to start poking really deep into lives on a monumental level.
These shameless idiots just placed their families and friends in a very uncomfortable situation that will not go away anytime soon.
And anyone that supports their actions is shameless as well.
.
musterion
Well-known member
As if an FBI investigation means jack at present BUT...if the FBI refuses to touch this or does a cursory exam and says "Nothing to see here," we'll know there are political connections to elites that cannot afford to be exposed, so it'll be dropped and distracted from next news cycle. And people will just...forget. Like we always do.
jeffblue101
New member
shooters facebook per TMZ
musterion
Well-known member
shooters facebook per TMZ
Has this been scrubbed after someone grabbed it? FB is good at sanitizing for the Left.
Yep.
Umm.
Which ones do you consider to be the ones that committed a criminal act at the rally?
The cops or the snipers?
musterion
Well-known member
Well...Democrat saint Lyndon B. Johnson did say he'd have black people voting Democrat for decades. So he had a point, though probably not the one he thought he had.
Not a question of needing or wanting one.
It's a question of if a war is instigated, will you pick a side and fight or just bury your head in the sand.
(Not speaking of you specifically, just in general.)
Me too.
jeffblue101
New member
Europe got a head start in following the godless Secular Humanists after WWI. The US is not too far behind and the election of Clinton would bring us down to about the level of Europe.
This Charming Manc
Well-known member
No one had taken sides, and read the first line.
Incidents don't happen in vacumes, events lead up and away from tragic events. Asking questions round them may give you the ability to consider limiting the chances of them happening again.
Moral indignation may make you feel more certain about the uncertain world you live in and how wonderful you are, but gives you no ability to consider ways to limit this from happening again.
This Charming Manc
Well-known member
To right it was.
It was a reaction to the numerous dubious shootings of black people by white police officers.
That is an obvious fact.
What doesn't seem obvious is that both are clearly wrong. You seem in abject denial about the issue the escalated into this confrontation.
What would people on this board be suggesting if black police officers were regularly murdering and abusing white citizens because of racial profiling. I'm sure more than one would be shouting for 'civil war' and the shooting the black police officers.
The denial of this clear problem is part of the build it to today's events.
What has seemed to happen today is that 4 citizens of the USA chose to fight the authorities and probably die, because they were so disgusted by the lack of justice afforded to there racial grouping within the USA.
To an extent these men were not overly different to the Oregon protestors, just at a different extreme, and from a different racial grouping, they were more direct and ruthless than the guys at Oregon, but they had the same sense of alienation and not belonging and were willing to take it to the end of the line.
The snipers, of course, were the criminals in this case. You don't think there was an attempt to tie the snipers to BLM in this thread?