:argue:I would like to remind You of the fact and respectfully say that - Even Paul never mentions a Holy Trinity.
The entire Bible never mentions or calls Yahoshua a separate PERSON of a threesome or a three part / portions of Gods makeup. But the Bible defines Yahoshua as the physical expressed image of Gods Deity. Not another PERSON or INDIVIDUAL.
The Trinity Translators added and made many, many changed to God's word Even ADDED words\, in order to support the doctrine of the trinity. - The word GODHEAD is never a part of the original manuscripts - it was added by the trinitarian translators. Saint Paul defined the faith very clearly - there is no reason to make up new words to support a Roman Catholic Trinitarian Philosophy. If the trinitarian was intellectually honest and looking to accurately study the scriptures, He would take the time and effort to simply just go back a single verse and compare this previous verse here at Php 2:4 and 5 - and see how it connects and relates to Php 2:5 - 6 - 7 and on. !
BUT Look - Here below ..... - I have simply combined the joined and mixed the reading of The Php 2:4 and 5 - From All the combined connected modern TRINITARIAN TRANSLATIONS that exist.
And I have compared the two verses Php 2:4 and 5 one at a time with the modern translations compared with The Original Greek Manuscript. Php 2:4
MODERN TRINITARIAN TRANSLATIONS - = Php 2:4 Let each of you every man consider concern not only for regard for each his own [qualities] about fixing his attention on His own personal interests and looking out only for the things of themselves, but each of you take an interest in others, too.
ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPT texts........ - = Php 2:4 Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others.
Now let’s look at Php 2:5
Php 2:5
MODERN TRINITARIAN TRANSLATIONS - = Php 2:5 In your relationships with one another, among yourselves, Let the same disposition be made, You must Make your own attitudes to have the same attitudes and same mindsets in you. And reason in your souls that same mindset which was also in Yashua the Messiah Christ Jesus.
OK - ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPT teXTs........ - = Php 2:5 For think or regard this in yourselves who are also in Christ Jesus. ________________________
If We put the two Verses together - ( Verse 4 and 5 } Reading from the original manuscripts all that the simple basic manuscript teXt is saying is that we should not look only to our own things but look also on the things of others.
And = For think and regard this in yourselves who are also in Christ Jesus.
That's it. ! - End of the topic. -AND - - The Subject mentioned above was how that we are not just Look out for ourselves but also look out for others l - ADDRESSED TO ALL WHO ARE IN CHRIST JESUS - End of the topic. - The Trinitarians attempt to create a run on sentence- The next verse and the rest of the chapter is a new topic -
A run-on sentence. A grammatically faulty sentence in which two or more main or independent clauses are joined without a word to connect them or a punctuation mark to separate them: “The fog was thick he could not find his way home.”
The FACT is that the Manuscripts simply say in Php 2 that { Yaahoshua, The Anointed Who, was in the form / morph of God, thought it not robbery or seizing, taking (by force) to be or to eXist as equal to God. - But a vain, non-effect reputation. Himself, taking or receiving the form / morph of a servant. Was made in the likeness of men:
The Roman Catholic Trinitarians purposely ran the two sentences together with the next verse, Verse 6, verses 5 and 6 and created a trinity theory. by using a - run-on sentence.
Php Chapter 2 verse 5 and verse 6 are not about the same subject. Verse 6 is about The ONE SINGLE Subject of Yaahoshuah Who is mentioned above and that is the ending of verse 5.
Verse 5 is not a part of verse 6 - But 6 is explaining a single Noun in the previous Verse.
The Noun is Yahoshua not a Trinitarian Mind Set that is invented by mistranslating and misconstruing the two verses in such a perverted incorrect ( ADDING ONTO THE TEXT MANOR } or way, to attempt to run them together and create a trinity perversion of confusion and ignorance.
When Php Chapter 2 verse 5 and verse 6, are not the same subject or part of the same topic.
And are not related to one another in subject.
Verse 5 means - = For think and regard this in yourselves who are also in Christ Jesus
It does not mean - = Hey ! = think about the Godhead and the Trinity in this same exact way as Jesus did, also.
- Php 2:5 For think or regard this in yourselves who are also in Christ Jesus.
Think what ? - = - Php 2:4 Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others. The end of the subject..
It means = THINK ABOUT OR UPON - the things of others and not just Your own things.
Trinitarians, also ignore that Yahoshua was equal to God The Father - But took on the MORPH / form of a servant - A man. He was MORPHED / MADE in the FORM / MORPH of the likeness / same - ness of sinful flesh / man. This is why Yahoshua will literally be sitting " IN " the throne of the Father. - He is the FACE Of The Father and is given the RIGHT OF THE THRONE - and THE RIGHT OF POWER.
Ezekiel 39:29 "I will not hide My face from them any longer, for I will have poured out My Spirit on the house of Israel," declares the Lord GOD.
The Bible clarifies that Yahoshua is the expression, the Image the expressed, shooting IMAGE of the Fathers Confidence and His Face. The Trinitarian Translators are willing to change the Manuscripts in order to mold, contour , shape and literally stamp their personal trinity doctrine into the manuscripts, as they change the original message. I agree with most everything that is here in the forum - however I can prove that the Trinitarian Translators auctually changed the Bible - to create a pre conceived doctrine and faith on many, many passages.
The Catholic Bible Translations have many, many contradictions with the Protestant Translations as well. This also proves that the translators were making deliberate changes to mold, codify and change the Bible to fit with their existing religious conceptions.
Thank You all for Your valuable time.
The entire Bible never mentions or calls Yahoshua a separate PERSON of a threesome or a three part / portions of Gods makeup. But the Bible defines Yahoshua as the physical expressed image of Gods Deity. Not another PERSON or INDIVIDUAL.
The Trinity Translators added and made many, many changed to God's word Even ADDED words\, in order to support the doctrine of the trinity. - The word GODHEAD is never a part of the original manuscripts - it was added by the trinitarian translators. Saint Paul defined the faith very clearly - there is no reason to make up new words to support a Roman Catholic Trinitarian Philosophy. If the trinitarian was intellectually honest and looking to accurately study the scriptures, He would take the time and effort to simply just go back a single verse and compare this previous verse here at Php 2:4 and 5 - and see how it connects and relates to Php 2:5 - 6 - 7 and on. !
BUT Look - Here below ..... - I have simply combined the joined and mixed the reading of The Php 2:4 and 5 - From All the combined connected modern TRINITARIAN TRANSLATIONS that exist.
And I have compared the two verses Php 2:4 and 5 one at a time with the modern translations compared with The Original Greek Manuscript. Php 2:4
MODERN TRINITARIAN TRANSLATIONS - = Php 2:4 Let each of you every man consider concern not only for regard for each his own [qualities] about fixing his attention on His own personal interests and looking out only for the things of themselves, but each of you take an interest in others, too.
ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPT texts........ - = Php 2:4 Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others.
Now let’s look at Php 2:5
Php 2:5
MODERN TRINITARIAN TRANSLATIONS - = Php 2:5 In your relationships with one another, among yourselves, Let the same disposition be made, You must Make your own attitudes to have the same attitudes and same mindsets in you. And reason in your souls that same mindset which was also in Yashua the Messiah Christ Jesus.
OK - ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPT teXTs........ - = Php 2:5 For think or regard this in yourselves who are also in Christ Jesus. ________________________
If We put the two Verses together - ( Verse 4 and 5 } Reading from the original manuscripts all that the simple basic manuscript teXt is saying is that we should not look only to our own things but look also on the things of others.
And = For think and regard this in yourselves who are also in Christ Jesus.
That's it. ! - End of the topic. -AND - - The Subject mentioned above was how that we are not just Look out for ourselves but also look out for others l - ADDRESSED TO ALL WHO ARE IN CHRIST JESUS - End of the topic. - The Trinitarians attempt to create a run on sentence- The next verse and the rest of the chapter is a new topic -
A run-on sentence. A grammatically faulty sentence in which two or more main or independent clauses are joined without a word to connect them or a punctuation mark to separate them: “The fog was thick he could not find his way home.”
The FACT is that the Manuscripts simply say in Php 2 that { Yaahoshua, The Anointed Who, was in the form / morph of God, thought it not robbery or seizing, taking (by force) to be or to eXist as equal to God. - But a vain, non-effect reputation. Himself, taking or receiving the form / morph of a servant. Was made in the likeness of men:
The Roman Catholic Trinitarians purposely ran the two sentences together with the next verse, Verse 6, verses 5 and 6 and created a trinity theory. by using a - run-on sentence.
Php Chapter 2 verse 5 and verse 6 are not about the same subject. Verse 6 is about The ONE SINGLE Subject of Yaahoshuah Who is mentioned above and that is the ending of verse 5.
Verse 5 is not a part of verse 6 - But 6 is explaining a single Noun in the previous Verse.
The Noun is Yahoshua not a Trinitarian Mind Set that is invented by mistranslating and misconstruing the two verses in such a perverted incorrect ( ADDING ONTO THE TEXT MANOR } or way, to attempt to run them together and create a trinity perversion of confusion and ignorance.
When Php Chapter 2 verse 5 and verse 6, are not the same subject or part of the same topic.
And are not related to one another in subject.
Verse 5 means - = For think and regard this in yourselves who are also in Christ Jesus
It does not mean - = Hey ! = think about the Godhead and the Trinity in this same exact way as Jesus did, also.
- Php 2:5 For think or regard this in yourselves who are also in Christ Jesus.
Think what ? - = - Php 2:4 Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others. The end of the subject..
It means = THINK ABOUT OR UPON - the things of others and not just Your own things.
Trinitarians, also ignore that Yahoshua was equal to God The Father - But took on the MORPH / form of a servant - A man. He was MORPHED / MADE in the FORM / MORPH of the likeness / same - ness of sinful flesh / man. This is why Yahoshua will literally be sitting " IN " the throne of the Father. - He is the FACE Of The Father and is given the RIGHT OF THE THRONE - and THE RIGHT OF POWER.
Ezekiel 39:29 "I will not hide My face from them any longer, for I will have poured out My Spirit on the house of Israel," declares the Lord GOD.
The Bible clarifies that Yahoshua is the expression, the Image the expressed, shooting IMAGE of the Fathers Confidence and His Face. The Trinitarian Translators are willing to change the Manuscripts in order to mold, contour , shape and literally stamp their personal trinity doctrine into the manuscripts, as they change the original message. I agree with most everything that is here in the forum - however I can prove that the Trinitarian Translators auctually changed the Bible - to create a pre conceived doctrine and faith on many, many passages.
The Catholic Bible Translations have many, many contradictions with the Protestant Translations as well. This also proves that the translators were making deliberate changes to mold, codify and change the Bible to fit with their existing religious conceptions.
Thank You all for Your valuable time.
