Hypocrite.
No.
Hypocrite.
He was inspiring, he spoke of hope, he was humble, and smart. And his beliefs and his priorities aligned closely with mine.
How did they do that?
What did they ignore to get the results they want?Not explaining scientific method to you - did you not attend high school? There are tons of ways to do it.
i'm sure that trump supporters would say the same about trump
except for that "humble" part :chuckle:
maybe next time we can choose somebody whose merits include experience
What did they ignore to get the results they want?
How did they do that?
So you don't know any of that and yet you are confident that they ignored stuff to get the result they want?Provide the complete test criteria they used, their initial hypothesis, all parameters of the study and then i will critique it and tell you exactly where there are issues, ok?
Ive already stated 2 possibles not discussed.
So you don't know any of that and yet you are confident that they ignored stuff to get the result they want?
Provide the complete test criteria they used, their initial hypothesis, all parameters of the study and then i will critique it and tell you exactly where there are issues, ok?
Ive already stated 2 possibles not discussed.
But I vote on character more than anything else.
That NPR was disingenuous in what they stated and left out of their article? yes.
100 percent confident.
However, findings of the current study revealed that the impact of race differed in high and low income neighborhoods. Given the study methodology, drivers were merely observed and no inter-action took place regarding their decisions to yield or not yield.Therefore, we are unable to determine the nature of the bias.These findings are significant for pedestrian safety overall in that drivers yielded less often in general on the high income neigh-borhood street. One potential explanation may be that drivers are not as accustomed to observing pedestrians crossing in the high income neighborhood compared to the lower income neighbor-hood, as higher income individuals are more likely to travel by private vehicle (U.S. Census, 2014). The authors can only speculate on this, however, as overall pedestrian traffic in each neighbor-hood is unknown. Another factor for overall less yielding in the high income neighborhood may be the difference in road design,as the high income neighborhood street consisted of more vehicle lanes and a higher speed limit (45 mph compared to 35 mph). The higher speed of travel may make it more difficult to observe and yield to pedestrians in a timely manner. It is unknown if yielding differences would have persisted if this was not the case.
Interesting, isnt it.
NPR smelled a story they could sell
NPR smelled a story they could sell
Why do you think they smelled that? Liberals are propaganda loving lemmings?
Why do people never bother to just read the actual study?
I don't think it was being presented as proof of anything.Yes. It would seem, as the researchers suggest, that more research is needed to conclude anything.
Because they have itching ears that tell them what they want to hear instead.