glassjester
Well-known member
This is dumber than your usual statements.
Is that the best you can do?
This is dumber than your usual statements.
Women would want to go back to the 1920's rather than actually be equal to men.
Because feminism is inherently about privilege
http://www.npr.org/2017/02/15/51533...e-factor-in-car-crashes-involving-pedestrians
How about the privilege of not getting run over in the streets.
Perhaps violent black men are perpetrators too?
Also perhaps some arrogant people think its ok to jaywalk. Seen a lot of that myself, they just expect you to stop.
Then a lot of weird protesting happening where blm and libs are walking in the street.
Your article is a stretch.
Is it a privilege to get the same pay for the same work and experience level and number of years worked?
Is it a privilege to get the same pay for the same work and experience level and number of years worked?
Which particular employers aren't allowing that?
Ive had one, they paid me right real fast too when i inquired about it. Its why a lot of companies have rules about discussing your pay with one another. It happens all the time.
http://www.npr.org/2017/02/15/51533...e-factor-in-car-crashes-involving-pedestrians
How about the privilege of not getting run over in the streets.
Like any speculative fiction, who knows? Maybe most people voted for a hopeful message offered by a young-ish candidate. Maybe that hope wrapped in an unprecedented candidacy attracted others. Maybe any number of things. But to simplify it to the point of saying he won BECAUSE he was black is mostly indicative of how your bias focuses.If Hillary weren't a woman, and Obama wasn't black, neither Hillary would have came close or Obama have won.
No, everyone doesn't know that. In fact, I don't believe Hillary's sex had nearly as much to do with her nomination as her last name and association.Everybody knows that- you have to be injected with liberal nonsense to unlearn it.
Rather, education beyond the ruling class is itself is a fundamentally progressive notion. You'd have to try and put particulars to those sweeps of yours for most of that sentence to have real meaning. And we both know how often you don't manage that.When you turn campuses into liberal conformity camps, where even professors are put on trial.
white folks have the privilege of being more visible at night?
...(obama) won BECAUSE he was black ...
Lighter colors are more visible in the dark...
but that's not fair! :baby:
And when you pointed it out, you got equal pay. Good!
Do you think every man gets equal pay to every other man?
Companies will try that garbage with any employee that's not smart or brave enough to speak up about it.
Like any speculative fiction, who knows? Maybe most people voted for a hopeful message offered by a young-ish candidate. Maybe that hope wrapped in an unprecedented candidacy attracted others. Maybe any number of things. But to simplify it to the point of saying he won BECAUSE he was black is mostly indicative of how your bias focuses.
No, everyone doesn't know that. In fact, I don't believe Hillary's sex had nearly as much to do with her nomination as her last name and association.
Rather, education beyond the ruling class is itself is a fundamentally progressive notion. You'd have to try and put particulars to those sweeps of yours for most of that sentence to have real meaning. And we both know how often you don't manage that.
It's a real nailbiter!
No black man has ever came close to winning the the presidency. Yet, the one who did not only won it but also won it by a landslide.
That doesn't seem to me like anything else than being ushered in by one's skin color. I can almost guarantee that McCain would have otherwise won, and so can many other people.
Because ~reality~
So...we had a solid run of 43 lily-white presidents
... very racist.
People voted for a black man on his merits.